IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential in-hospital mortality and intensive care treatment over time: Informing hospital pathways for modelling COVID-19 in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lise Jamieson
  • Cari Van Schalkwyk
  • Brooke E Nichols
  • Gesine Meyer-Rath
  • Sheetal Silal
  • Juliet Pulliam
  • Lucille Blumberg
  • Cheryl Cohen
  • Harry Moultrie
  • Waasila Jassat

Abstract

There are limited published data within sub-Saharan Africa describing hospital pathways of COVID-19 patients hospitalized. These data are crucial for the parameterisation of epidemiological and cost models, and for planning purposes for the region. We evaluated COVID-19 hospital admissions from the South African national hospital surveillance system (DATCOV) during the first three COVID-19 waves between May 2020 and August 2021. We describe probabilities and admission into intensive care units (ICU), mechanical ventilation, death, and lengths of stay (LOS) in non-ICU and ICU care in public and private sectors. A log-binomial model was used to quantify mortality risk, ICU treatment and mechanical ventilation between time periods, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, health sector and province. There were 342,700 COVID-19-related hospital admissions during the study period. Risk of ICU admission was 16% lower during wave periods (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.84 [0.82–0.86]) compared to between-wave periods. Mechanical ventilation was more likely during a wave overall (aRR 1.18 [1.13–1.23]), but patterns between waves were inconsistent, while mortality risk in non-ICU and ICU were 39% (aRR 1.39 [1.35–1.43]) and 31% (aRR 1.31 [1.27–1.36]) higher during a wave, compared to between-wave periods, respectively. If patients had had the same probability of death during waves vs between-wave periods, we estimated approximately 24% [19%-30%] of deaths (19,600 [15,200–24,000]) would not have occurred over the study period. LOS differed by age (older patients stayed longer), ward type (ICU stays were longer than non-ICU) and death/recovery outcome (time to death was shorter in non-ICU); however, LOS remained similar between time periods. Healthcare capacity constraints as inferred by wave period have a large impact on in-hospital mortality. It is crucial for modelling health systems strain and budgets to consider how input parameters related to hospitalisation change during and between waves, especially in settings with severely constrained resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Lise Jamieson & Cari Van Schalkwyk & Brooke E Nichols & Gesine Meyer-Rath & Sheetal Silal & Juliet Pulliam & Lucille Blumberg & Cheryl Cohen & Harry Moultrie & Waasila Jassat, 2023. "Differential in-hospital mortality and intensive care treatment over time: Informing hospital pathways for modelling COVID-19 in South Africa," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001073
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001073
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001073&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hagai Rossman & Tomer Meir & Jonathan Somer & Smadar Shilo & Rom Gutman & Asaf Arie & Eran Segal & Uri Shalit & Malka Gorfine, 2021. "Hospital load and increased COVID-19 related mortality in Israel," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheetal Prakash Silal & Juliet R C Pulliam & Gesine Meyer-Rath & Lise Jamieson & Brooke E Nichols & Jared Norman & Rachel Hounsell & Saadiyah Mayet & Frank Kagoro & Harry Moultrie, 2023. "The National COVID-19 Epi Model (NCEM): Estimating cases, admissions and deaths for the first wave of COVID-19 in South Africa," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dizioli, Allan & Pinheiro, Roberto, 2021. "Information and inequality in the time of a pandemic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. John F. Helliwell & Max B. Norton & Shun Wang & Lara B. Aknin & Haifang Huang, 2021. "Well-being Analysis Favours a Virus-Elimination Strategy for COVID-19," NBER Working Papers 29092, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Pedro C Álvarez-Esteban & Eustasio del Barrio & Oscar M Rueda & Cristina Rueda, 2021. "Predicting COVID-19 progression from diagnosis to recovery or death linking primary care and hospital records in Castilla y León (Spain)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Epp, Markus & Jäger, Marius, 2021. "Network Exposure in the Propagation of the COVID-19 Pandemic," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242465, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Proaño, Christian R. & Kukacka, Jiri & Makarewicz, Tomasz, 2024. "Belief-driven dynamics in a behavioral SEIRD macroeconomic model with sceptics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 312-333.
    6. Walmsley, Terrie & Rose, Adam & John, Richard & Wei, Dan & Hlávka, Jakub P. & Machado, Juan & Byrd, Katie, 2023. "Macroeconomic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.