IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of motorised transport and pathways to childbirth care in health facilities: Evidence from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Cephas Ke-on Avoka
  • Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas
  • Lenka Beňová
  • Emma Radovich
  • Oona M R Campbell

Abstract

In Nigeria, 59% of pregnant women deliver at home, despite evidence about the benefits of childbirth in health facilities. While different modes of transport can be used to access childbirth care, motorised transport guarantees quicker transfer compared to non-motorised forms. Our study uses the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) to describe the pathways to childbirth care and the determinants of using motorised transport to reach this care. The most recent live birth of women 15–49 years within the five years preceding the NDHS were included. The main outcome of the study was the use of motorised transport to childbirth. Explanatory variables were women’s socio-demographic characteristics and pregnancy-related factors. Descriptive, crude, and adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the determinants of use of motorised transport. Overall, 31% of all women in Nigeria used motorised transport to get to their place of childbirth. Among women who delivered in health facilities, 77% used motorised transport; among women referred during childbirth from one facility to another, this was 98%. Among all women, adjusted odds of using motorised transport increased with increasing wealth quintile and educational level. Among women who gave birth in a health facility, there was no difference in the adjusted odds of motorised transport across wealth quintiles or educational status, but higher for women who were referred between health facilities (aOR = 8.87, 95% CI 1.90–41.40). Women who experienced at least one complication of labour/childbirth had higher odds of motorised transport use (aOR = 3.01, 95% CI 2.55–3.55, all women sample). Our study shows that women with higher education and wealth and women travelling to health facilities because of pregnancy complications were more likely to use motorised transport. Obstetric transport interventions targeting particularly vulnerable, less educated, and less privileged pregnant women should bridge the equity gap in accessing childbirth services.

Suggested Citation

  • Cephas Ke-on Avoka & Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas & Lenka Beňová & Emma Radovich & Oona M R Campbell, 2022. "Use of motorised transport and pathways to childbirth care in health facilities: Evidence from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000868
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000868
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000868&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thaddeus, Sereen & Maine, Deborah, 1994. "Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1091-1110, April.
    2. Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi & Avoka, Cephas & Olaniran, Abimbola & Balogun, Mobolanle & Wright, Ololade & Ekerin, Olabode & Benova, Lenka, 2021. "Patterns, travel to care and factors influencing obstetric referral: Evidence from Nigeria's most urbanised state," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gayen, Kaberi & Raeside, Robert, 2007. "Social networks, normative influence and health delivery in rural Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 900-914, September.
    2. Lídia Farré, 2013. "The Role of Men in the Economic and Social Development of Women: Implications for Gender Equality," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 22-51, February.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0155144 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Lillian Whiting-Collins & Florina Serbanescu & Ann-Beth Moller & Susanna Binzen & Jean-Pierre Monet & Jenny A Cresswell & Michel Brun & on behalf of the World Health Organization’s MDSR Reporting and , 2024. "Maternal death surveillance and response system reports from 32 low-middle income countries, 2011–2020: What can we learn from the reports?," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Kusuma, Dian & Cohen, Jessica & McConnell, Margaret & Berman, Peter, 2016. "Can cash transfers improve determinants of maternal mortality? Evidence from the household and community programs in Indonesia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 10-20.
    6. Sushma Rajbanshi & Mohd Noor Norhayati & Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina, 2021. "Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Weitzman, Abigail, 2017. "The effects of women's education on maternal health: Evidence from Peru," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Sara Rivenes Lafontan & Johanne Sundby & Hege L. Ersdal & Muzdalifat Abeid & Hussein L. Kidanto & Columba K. Mbekenga, 2018. "“I Was Relieved to Know That My Baby Was Safe” : Women’s Attitudes and Perceptions on Using a New Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitor during Labor in Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Benjamin M Hunter & Sean Harrison & Anayda Portela & Debra Bick, 2017. "The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-37, March.
    10. Kasperi Kilpi & Soorej Puthoopparambil & Rejina Gurung & Honey Malla & Omkar Basnet & Ashish KC, 2025. "Association of international remittance with satisfaction and utilization of maternal healthcare services in Nepal: A secondary analysis of two cohort studies," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 51-67, January.
    11. Habtamu Tolera & Tegegne Gebre-Egziabher & Helmut Kloos, 2020. "Using Andersen’s behavioral model of health care utilization in a decentralized program to examine the use of antenatal care in rural western Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Matsuoka, Sadatoshi & Aiga, Hirotsugu & Rasmey, Lon Chan & Rathavy, Tung & Okitsu, Akiko, 2010. "Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(2-3), pages 255-263, May.
    13. Hirose, Atsumi & Borchert, Matthias & Niksear, Homa & Alkozai, Ahmad Shah & Cox, Jonathan & Gardiner, Julian & Osmani, Khadija Ruina & Filippi, Véronique, 2011. "Difficulties leaving home: A cross-sectional study of delays in seeking emergency obstetric care in Herat, Afghanistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1003-1013.
    14. Kibballi Madhukeshwar Akshaya & Siddharudha Shivalli, 2017. "Birth preparedness and complication readiness among the women beneficiaries of selected rural primary health centers of Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Nicholas Apreh Siaw & Samuel Kwofie, 2016. "Assessment of the Effects of the Free Maternal Health Policy on Maternal Health: A Case Study of New Juaben Municipality, Koforidua, Ghana," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(7), pages 52-62, July.
    16. Nancy A Scott & Taryn Vian & Jeanette L Kaiser & Thandiwe Ngoma & Kaluba Mataka & Elizabeth G Henry & Godfrey Biemba & Mary Nambao & Davidson H Hamer, 2018. "Listening to the community: Using formative research to strengthen maternity waiting homes in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Nyaaba, Albert Apotele & Ayamga, Matthew, 2021. "Intricacies of medical drones in healthcare delivery: Implications for Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Tanser, Frank & Gijsbertsen, Brice & Herbst, Kobus, 2006. "Modelling and understanding primary health care accessibility and utilization in rural South Africa: An exploration using a geographical information system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 691-705, August.
    19. So O'Neil & Katie Naeve & Rajani Ved, "undated". "An Examination of the Maternal Health Quality of Care Landscape in India," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b4ac5292bf6148798f37782c2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Md Ashfikur Rahman & Md Amirul Islam & Mortuja Mahamud Tohan & S M Muhibullah & Md Sazedur Rahman & Md Hasan Howlader, 2024. "Socioeconomic inequalities in utilizing maternal health care in five South Asian countries: A decomposition analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, February.
    21. Fredrick Manang & Chikako Yamauchi, 2015. "The impact of access to health facilities on maternal care use and health status: Evidence from longitudinal data from rural Uganda," GRIPS Discussion Papers 15-19, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.