IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal death surveillance and response system reports from 32 low-middle income countries, 2011–2020: What can we learn from the reports?

Author

Listed:
  • Lillian Whiting-Collins
  • Florina Serbanescu
  • Ann-Beth Moller
  • Susanna Binzen
  • Jean-Pierre Monet
  • Jenny A Cresswell
  • Michel Brun
  • on behalf of the World Health Organization’s MDSR Reporting and Monitoring Working Group

Abstract

Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) systems generate information that may aid efforts to end preventable maternal deaths. Many countries report MDSR data, but comparability over time and across settings has not been studied. We reviewed MDSR reports from low-and-middle income countries (LMICs) to examine core content and identify how surveillance data and data dissemination could be improved to guide recommendations and actions. We conducted deductive content analysis of 56 MDSR reports from 32 LMICs. A codebook was developed assessing how reports captured: 1) MDSR system implementation, 2) monitoring of maternal death notifications and reviews, and 3) response formulation and implementation. Reports published before 2014 focused on maternal death reviews only. In September 2013, the World Health Organization and partners published the global MDSR guidance, which advised that country reports should also include identification, notification and response activities. Of the 56 reports, 33 (59%) described their data as incomplete, meaning that not all maternal deaths were captured. While 45 (80%) reports presented the total number of maternal deaths that had been notified (officially reported), only 16 (29%) calculated notification rates. Deaths were reported at both community and facility levels in 31 (55%) reports, but 25 (45%) reported facility deaths only. The number of maternal deaths reviewed was reported in 33 (59%) reports, and 17 (30%) calculated review completion rates. While 48 (86%) reports provided recommendations for improving MDSR, evidence of actions based on prior recommendations was absent from 40 (71%) of subsequent reports. MDSR reports currently vary in content and in how response efforts are documented. Comprehensive reports could improve accountability and effectiveness of the system by providing feedback to MDSR stakeholders and information for action. A standard reporting template may improve the quality and comparability of MDSR data and their use for preventing future maternal deaths.

Suggested Citation

  • Lillian Whiting-Collins & Florina Serbanescu & Ann-Beth Moller & Susanna Binzen & Jean-Pierre Monet & Jenny A Cresswell & Michel Brun & on behalf of the World Health Organization’s MDSR Reporting and , 2024. "Maternal death surveillance and response system reports from 32 low-middle income countries, 2011–2020: What can we learn from the reports?," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002153
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002153
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002153&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thaddeus, Sereen & Maine, Deborah, 1994. "Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1091-1110, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gayen, Kaberi & Raeside, Robert, 2007. "Social networks, normative influence and health delivery in rural Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 900-914, September.
    2. Lídia Farré, 2013. "The Role of Men in the Economic and Social Development of Women: Implications for Gender Equality," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 22-51, February.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0155144 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kusuma, Dian & Cohen, Jessica & McConnell, Margaret & Berman, Peter, 2016. "Can cash transfers improve determinants of maternal mortality? Evidence from the household and community programs in Indonesia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 10-20.
    5. Sushma Rajbanshi & Mohd Noor Norhayati & Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina, 2021. "Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Weitzman, Abigail, 2017. "The effects of women's education on maternal health: Evidence from Peru," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Sara Rivenes Lafontan & Johanne Sundby & Hege L. Ersdal & Muzdalifat Abeid & Hussein L. Kidanto & Columba K. Mbekenga, 2018. "“I Was Relieved to Know That My Baby Was Safe” : Women’s Attitudes and Perceptions on Using a New Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitor during Labor in Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Benjamin M Hunter & Sean Harrison & Anayda Portela & Debra Bick, 2017. "The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-37, March.
    9. Kasperi Kilpi & Soorej Puthoopparambil & Rejina Gurung & Honey Malla & Omkar Basnet & Ashish KC, 2025. "Association of international remittance with satisfaction and utilization of maternal healthcare services in Nepal: A secondary analysis of two cohort studies," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 51-67, January.
    10. Habtamu Tolera & Tegegne Gebre-Egziabher & Helmut Kloos, 2020. "Using Andersen’s behavioral model of health care utilization in a decentralized program to examine the use of antenatal care in rural western Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Matsuoka, Sadatoshi & Aiga, Hirotsugu & Rasmey, Lon Chan & Rathavy, Tung & Okitsu, Akiko, 2010. "Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(2-3), pages 255-263, May.
    12. Hirose, Atsumi & Borchert, Matthias & Niksear, Homa & Alkozai, Ahmad Shah & Cox, Jonathan & Gardiner, Julian & Osmani, Khadija Ruina & Filippi, Véronique, 2011. "Difficulties leaving home: A cross-sectional study of delays in seeking emergency obstetric care in Herat, Afghanistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1003-1013.
    13. Kibballi Madhukeshwar Akshaya & Siddharudha Shivalli, 2017. "Birth preparedness and complication readiness among the women beneficiaries of selected rural primary health centers of Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Nicholas Apreh Siaw & Samuel Kwofie, 2016. "Assessment of the Effects of the Free Maternal Health Policy on Maternal Health: A Case Study of New Juaben Municipality, Koforidua, Ghana," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(7), pages 52-62, July.
    15. Nancy A Scott & Taryn Vian & Jeanette L Kaiser & Thandiwe Ngoma & Kaluba Mataka & Elizabeth G Henry & Godfrey Biemba & Mary Nambao & Davidson H Hamer, 2018. "Listening to the community: Using formative research to strengthen maternity waiting homes in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Nyaaba, Albert Apotele & Ayamga, Matthew, 2021. "Intricacies of medical drones in healthcare delivery: Implications for Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Tanser, Frank & Gijsbertsen, Brice & Herbst, Kobus, 2006. "Modelling and understanding primary health care accessibility and utilization in rural South Africa: An exploration using a geographical information system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 691-705, August.
    18. So O'Neil & Katie Naeve & Rajani Ved, "undated". "An Examination of the Maternal Health Quality of Care Landscape in India," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b4ac5292bf6148798f37782c2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    19. Md Ashfikur Rahman & Md Amirul Islam & Mortuja Mahamud Tohan & S M Muhibullah & Md Sazedur Rahman & Md Hasan Howlader, 2024. "Socioeconomic inequalities in utilizing maternal health care in five South Asian countries: A decomposition analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Fredrick Manang & Chikako Yamauchi, 2015. "The impact of access to health facilities on maternal care use and health status: Evidence from longitudinal data from rural Uganda," GRIPS Discussion Papers 15-19, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    21. Aboud, Frances E. & Rahman, Ehsanur & Kassam, Rosemin & Khan, Jasmin & Ali, Nabeel Ashraf & Taleb, Fahmida, 2017. "Interrupting pathways to sepsis: Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce delays in timely care for sick children in rural Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 269-277.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.