IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental machine learning study investigating the decision-making process of students and qualified radiographers when interpreting radiographic images

Author

Listed:
  • Clare Rainey
  • Angelina T Villikudathil
  • Jonathan McConnell
  • Ciara Hughes
  • Raymond Bond
  • Sonyia McFadden

Abstract

AI is becoming more prevalent in healthcare and is predicted to be further integrated into workflows to ease the pressure on an already stretched service. The National Health Service in the UK has prioritised AI and Digital health as part of its Long-Term Plan. Few studies have examined the human interaction with such systems in healthcare, despite reports of biases being present with the use of AI in other technologically advanced fields, such as finance and aviation. Understanding is needed of how certain user characteristics may impact how radiographers engage with AI systems in use in the clinical setting to mitigate against problems before they arise. The aim of this study is to determine correlations of skills, confidence in AI and perceived knowledge amongst student and qualified radiographers in the UK healthcare system. A machine learning based AI model was built to predict if the interpreter was either a student (n = 67) or a qualified radiographer (n = 39) in advance, using important variables from a feature selection technique named Boruta. A survey, which required the participant to interpret a series of plain radiographic examinations with and without AI assistance, was created on the Qualtrics survey platform and promoted via social media (Twitter/LinkedIn), therefore adopting convenience, snowball sampling This survey was open to all UK radiographers, including students and retired radiographers.Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed that males who were proficient in their profession were more likely than females to trust AI. Trust in AI was negatively correlated with age and with level of experience. A machine learning model was built, the best model predicted the image interpreter to be qualified radiographers with 0.93 area under curve and a prediction accuracy of 93%. Further testing in prospective validation cohorts using a larger sample size is required to determine the clinical utility of the proposed machine learning model.Author summary: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly integrated into healthcare systems. Radiology, as a technologically advanced profession, is one area where AI has proved useful for myriad tasks. Developments in computer vision have allowed for applications in computer aided diagnosis using radiographic images. The integration and development of AI has been supported by healthcare providers and government agencies, such as the NHS in the UK. With the introduction of these systems in the clinical setting it is imperative to understand the nuances of the interaction between the clinicians using the technology and the system. Trust has been cited as a potentially significant issue in the effective integration of AI in radiology. Our research pinpoints the factors which have an impact on trust in radiographers and clarifies the strength of these associations. The means of analysis (Boruta) used provides an assessment of any correlations, allowing for intervention to be made. We found that females were less likely to trust AI that males and that trust in AI was negatively correlated with age and level of experience, indicating areas were further investigation and intervention are needed to ensure balanced trust and effective integration of AI in clinical radiography.

Suggested Citation

  • Clare Rainey & Angelina T Villikudathil & Jonathan McConnell & Ciara Hughes & Raymond Bond & Sonyia McFadden, 2023. "An experimental machine learning study investigating the decision-making process of students and qualified radiographers when interpreting radiographic images," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000229
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.