IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ATRPred: A machine learning based tool for clinical decision making of anti-TNF treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Author

Listed:
  • Bodhayan Prasad
  • Cathy McGeough
  • Amanda Eakin
  • Tan Ahmed
  • Dawn Small
  • Philip Gardiner
  • Adrian Pendleton
  • Gary Wright
  • Anthony J Bjourson
  • David S Gibson
  • Priyank Shukla

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune condition, characterised by joint pain, damage and disability, which can be addressed in a high proportion of patients by timely use of targeted biologic treatments. However, the patients, non-responsive to the treatments often suffer from refractoriness of the disease, leading to poor quality of life. Additionally, the biologic treatments are expensive. We obtained plasma samples from N = 144 participants with RA, who were about to commence anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. These samples were sent to Olink Proteomics, Uppsala, Sweden, where proximity extension assays of 4 panels, containing 92 proteins each, were performed. A total of n = 89 samples of patients passed the quality control. The preliminary analysis of plasma protein expression values suggested that the RA population could be divided into two distinct molecular sub-groups (endotypes). However, these broad groups did not predict response to anti-TNF treatment, but were significantly different in terms of gender and their disease activity. We then labelled these patients as responders (n = 60) and non-responders (n = 29) based on the change in disease activity score (DAS) after 6 months of anti-TNF treatment and applied machine learning (ML) with a rigorous 5-fold nested cross-validation scheme to filter 17 proteins that were significantly associated with the treatment response. We have developed a ML based classifier ATRPred (anti-TNF treatment response predictor), which can predict anti-TNF treatment response in RA patients with 81% accuracy, 75% sensitivity and 86% specificity. ATRPred may aid clinicians to direct anti-TNF therapy to patients most likely to receive benefit, thus save cost as well as prevent non-responsive patients from refractory consequences. ATRPred is implemented in R.Author summary: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease, characterised by joint pain, damage and disability. It is known to affect at least 1% of European population. It can be addressed in a high proportion of patients by timely use of targeted biologic treatments. But, biologic treatments continue to rank among the highest grossing drugs. Adalimumab (a biologic drug) for example, alone generated 20 billion US dollars of revenue worldwide in 2018. Additionally, European countries with limited resources, place volume controls on reimbursed medicines. A cheaper prognostic test for biologic response can help clinicians prescribe treatments to those who will receive benefit and also rationalise expensive treatments. In this study we have proposed an informative plasma protein signature, consisting of 17 proteins, and have developed a ML based classifier ATRPred (Anti-TNF Response Predictor), which can predict anti-TNF treatment response in RA patients with 81% accuracy. With this work we have tried to help clinicians to optimise treatment selection, reduce spend on biologics in unresponsive patients and overall improve quality of life for non-responsive RA patients. Our study has also identified endotypes or molecular sub-classes of RA using plasma protein profiles. These endotypes did not show difference in the responsiveness towards the anti-TNF, however they may be helpful in understanding of the disease and response to other treatments, going forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Bodhayan Prasad & Cathy McGeough & Amanda Eakin & Tan Ahmed & Dawn Small & Philip Gardiner & Adrian Pendleton & Gary Wright & Anthony J Bjourson & David S Gibson & Priyank Shukla, 2022. "ATRPred: A machine learning based tool for clinical decision making of anti-TNF treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010204
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010204&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kampstra, Peter, 2008. "Beanplot: A Boxplot Alternative for Visual Comparison of Distributions," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(c01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chanseok Park & Min Wang, 2024. "Parameter Estimation of Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution under Competing Risks Using the Quantile Variant of the Expectation-Maximization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Carolina Müller & Manja Hethke & Frank Riedel & Gerhard Helle, 2020. "Inter- and intra-tree variability of carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratios of modern pollen from nine European tree species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-35, June.
    3. David W. Gerbing, 2024. "The Integrated Violin-Box-Scatter (VBS) Plot to Visualize the Distribution of a Continuous Variable," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Jibo Yue & Ting Li & Jianing Shen & Yihao Wei & Xin Xu & Yang Liu & Haikuan Feng & Xinming Ma & Changchun Li & Guijun Yang & Hongbo Qiao & Hao Yang & Qian Liu, 2024. "Winter Wheat Maturity Prediction via Sentinel-2 MSI Images," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Aravindakshan, Sreejith & Rossi, Frederick J. & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2015. "What does benchmarking of wheat farmers practicing conservation tillage in the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains tell us about energy use efficiency? An application of slack-based data envelopment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 483-493.
    6. Markus Demary, 2017. "Yield curve responses to market sentiments and monetary policy," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(2), pages 309-344, July.
    7. Miroslav Sirota & Marie Juanchich, 2015. "A direct and comprehensive test of two postulates of politeness theory applied to uncertainty communication," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(3), pages 232-240, May.
    8. Manuel Mendoza-Carranza & Elisabet Ejarque & Leopold A J Nagelkerke, 2018. "Disentangling the complexity of tropical small-scale fisheries dynamics using supervised Self-Organizing Maps," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Barrios Ramos, Iris & Espinoza Tenorio, Alejandro & Mesa Jurado, M. Azahara & Tovilla Hernández, Cristian & Mendoza Carranza, Manuel, 2021. "Percepción social de la salinización del agua para uso doméstico en Puerto Madero, Chiapas, México," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(01), June.
    10. Andreas M Neophytou & Elizabeth M Noth & Sa Liu & Sadie Costello & S Katharine Hammond & Mark R Cullen & Ellen A Eisen, 2016. "Ischemic Heart Disease Incidence in Relation to Fine versus Total Particulate Matter Exposure in a U.S. Aluminum Industry Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Kolassa, Stephan, 2016. "Evaluating predictive count data distributions in retail sales forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 788-803.
    12. Brzezinski, Michal, 2014. "Do wealth distributions follow power laws? Evidence from ‘rich lists’," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 155-162.
    13. Michael C Thrun & Tino Gehlert & Alfred Ultsch, 2020. "Analyzing the fine structure of distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:232-240 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Vishva Danthurebandara & Jie Yu & Martina Vandebroek, 2015. "Designing choice experiments by optimizing the complexity level to individual abilities," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, March.
    16. John Joseph Valletta & Mario Recker, 2017. "Identification of immune signatures predictive of clinical protection from malaria," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Sara G. Romeo & Ilaria Secco & Edoardo Schneider & Christina M. Reumiller & Celio X. C. Santos & Anna Zoccarato & Vishal Musale & Aman Pooni & Xiaoke Yin & Konstantinos Theofilatos & Silvia Cellone Tr, 2023. "Human blood vessel organoids reveal a critical role for CTGF in maintaining microvascular integrity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Marcos Krull, 2020. "Comparing statistical analyses to estimate thresholds in ecotoxicology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.