IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007331.html

A flexible and generalizable model of online latent-state learning

Author

Listed:
  • Amy L Cochran
  • Josh M Cisler

Abstract

Many models of classical conditioning fail to describe important phenomena, notably the rapid return of fear after extinction. To address this shortfall, evidence converged on the idea that learning agents rely on latent-state inferences, i.e. an ability to index disparate associations from cues to rewards (or penalties) and infer which index (i.e. latent state) is presently active. Our goal was to develop a model of latent-state inferences that uses latent states to predict rewards from cues efficiently and that can describe behavior in a diverse set of experiments. The resulting model combines a Rescorla-Wagner rule, for which updates to associations are proportional to prediction error, with an approximate Bayesian rule, for which beliefs in latent states are proportional to prior beliefs and an approximate likelihood based on current associations. In simulation, we demonstrate the model’s ability to reproduce learning effects both famously explained and not explained by the Rescorla-Wagner model, including rapid return of fear after extinction, the Hall-Pearce effect, partial reinforcement extinction effect, backwards blocking, and memory modification. Lastly, we derive our model as an online algorithm to maximum likelihood estimation, demonstrating it is an efficient approach to outcome prediction. Establishing such a framework is a key step towards quantifying normative and pathological ranges of latent-state inferences in various contexts.Author summary: Computational researchers are increasingly interested in a structured form of learning known as latent-state inferences. Latent-state inferences is a type of learning that involves categorizing, generalizing, and recalling disparate associations between observations in one’s environment and is used in situations when the correct association is latent or unknown. This type of learning has been used to explain overgeneralization of a fear memory and the cognitive role of certain brain regions important to cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry. Accordingly, latent-state inferences are an important area of inquiry. Through simulation and theory, we establish a new model of latent-state inferences. Moving forward, we aim to use this framework to measure latent-state inferences in healthy and psychiatric populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy L Cochran & Josh M Cisler, 2019. "A flexible and generalizable model of online latent-state learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007331
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007331
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007331&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Cappé & Eric Moulines, 2009. "On‐line expectation–maximization algorithm for latent data models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 593-613, June.
    2. Nathaniel D. Daw & John P. O'Doherty & Peter Dayan & Ben Seymour & Raymond J. Dolan, 2006. "Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7095), pages 876-879, June.
    3. Daniela Schiller & Marie-H. Monfils & Candace M. Raio & David C. Johnson & Joseph E. LeDoux & Elizabeth A. Phelps, 2010. "Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7277), pages 49-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    2. Maire, Florian & Moulines, Eric & Lefebvre, Sidonie, 2017. "Online EM for functional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 27-47.
    3. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:691-719 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Shi, Yuwei & Herniman, John, 2023. "The role of expectation in innovation evolution: Exploring hype cycles," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Sashittal, Hemant C. & Sriramachandramurthy, Rajendran & Hodis, Monica, 2012. "Targeting college students on Facebook? How to stop wasting your money," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 495-507.
    6. Solnais, Céline & Andreu-Perez, Javier & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Andréu-Abela, Jaime, 2013. "The contribution of neuroscience to consumer research: A conceptual framework and empirical review," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 68-81.
    7. Peter S. Riefer & Bradley C. Love, 2015. "Unfazed by Both the Bull and Bear: Strategic Exploration in Dynamic Environments," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Luke J Ney & Patrick A F Laing & Trevor Steward & Daniel V Zuj & Simon Dymond & Ben Harrison & Bronwyn Graham & Kim L Felmingham, 2022. "Methodological implications of sample size and extinction gradient on the robustness of fear conditioning across different analytic strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Makoto Naruse & Eiji Yamamoto & Takashi Nakao & Takuma Akimoto & Hayato Saigo & Kazuya Okamura & Izumi Ojima & Georg Northoff & Hirokazu Hori, 2018. "Why is the environment important for decision making? Local reservoir model for choice-based learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Yilmaz Kocer, 2010. "Endogenous Learning with Bounded Memory," Working Papers 1290, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..
    11. Johannes Bill & Samuel J. Gershman & Jan Drugowitsch, 2022. "Visual motion perception as online hierarchical inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Ziang Liu & Zhuangyi Jiang & Li Shi & Fang Fang & Shiming Tang & Yang Zhou, 2025. "Neural correlates of trial outcome monitoring during long-term learning in primate posterior parietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Chen Wang & Yanliu Huang & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Stijn van OsselaerAssociate Editor, 2018. "“I Want to Know the Answer! Give Me Fish ’n’ Chips!”: The Impact of Curiosity on Indulgent Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1052-1067.
    14. Cecilia Forcato & María L C Rodríguez & María E Pedreira, 2011. "Repeated Labilization-Reconsolidation Processes Strengthen Declarative Memory in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Jeremy Gordon & Flavio Chierichetti & Alessandro Panconesi & Giovanni Pezzulo, 2023. "Information foraging with an oracle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Clémence Alméras & Valerian Chambon & Valentin Wyart, 2026. "Competing cognitive pressures on human exploration in the absence of trade-off with exploitation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Christina Fang & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Near-Term Liability of Exploitation: Exploration and Exploitation in Multistage Problems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 538-551, June.
    18. Donna Henderson & Gerton Lunter, 2020. "Efficient inference in state-space models through adaptive learning in online Monte Carlo expectation maximization," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1319-1344, September.
    19. Crystal Reeck & Xue Guo & Angelika Dimoka & Paul A. Pavlou, 2024. "Uncovering the Neural Processes of Privacy: A Neurally Informed Behavioral Intervention to Protect Information Privacy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 727-746, June.
    20. Zhongming Wu & Liu Yang & Valentina De Simone, 2026. "Behavioral portfolio optimization via cumulative prospect theory with a symmetric alternating direction method of multipliers," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 303-334, January.
    21. Benjamin D. Horne & Natalie M. Rice & Catherine A. Luther & Damian J. Ruck & Joshua Borycz & Suzie L. Allard & Michael Fitzgerald & Oleg Manaev & Brandon C. Prins & Maureen Taylor & R. Alexander Bentl, 2023. "Generational effects of culture and digital media in former Soviet Republics," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.