IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinetic Modeling of ABCG2 Transporter Heterogeneity: A Quantitative, Single-Cell Analysis of the Side Population Assay

Author

Listed:
  • Adam F Prasanphanich
  • Douglas E White
  • Margaret A Gran
  • Melissa L Kemp

Abstract

The side population (SP) assay, a technique used in cancer and stem cell research, assesses the activity of ABC transporters on Hoechst staining in the presence and absence of transporter inhibition, identifying SP and non-SP cell (NSP) subpopulations by differential staining intensity. The interpretation of the assay is complicated because the transporter-mediated mechanisms fail to account for cell-to-cell variability within a population or adequately control the direct role of transporter activity on staining intensity. We hypothesized that differences in dye kinetics at the single-cell level, such as ABCG2 transporter-mediated efflux and DNA binding, are responsible for the differential cell staining that demarcates SP/NSP identity. We report changes in A549 phenotype during time in culture and with TGFβ treatment that correlate with SP size. Clonal expansion of individually sorted cells re-established both SP and NSPs, indicating that SP membership is dynamic. To assess the validity of a purely kinetics-based interpretation of SP/NSP identity, we developed a computational approach that simulated cell staining within a heterogeneous cell population; this exercise allowed for the direct inference of the role of transporter activity and inhibition on cell staining. Our simulated SP assay yielded appropriate SP responses for kinetic scenarios in which high transporter activity existed in a portion of the cells and little differential staining occurred in the majority of the population. With our approach for single-cell analysis, we observed SP and NSP cells at both ends of a transporter activity continuum, demonstrating that features of transporter activity as well as DNA content are determinants of SP/NSP identity.Author Summary: A common method of evaluating stemness among pluripotent cells or cancer cells is the side population assay, a flow cytometry technique which identifies a subgroup of cells that exhibit differences in dye fluorescence upon blocking of a membrane transporter. A technical limitation of this assay is that it relies on two independent experimental conditions, with and without a transporter inhibitor, preventing evaluation of single cell characteristics that generate population-level shifts in fluorescence. Here, the computational implementation of various forms of cellular heterogeneity allows for ensemble single-cell simulations to be performed in order to assess the underlying properties that give rise to the population-level behavior. We simulated staining in 10,000 kinetic ensembles consisting of 1,000-cell populations with and without inhibitor to determine which cells respond in the assay. We quantitatively establish that a small, responsive subgroup of cells with nonlinear activities associated with transporter number are most likely to recapitulate observed behavior in the side population assay; however, a continuum of phenotypes at different stages of the cell cycle and with a range transporter expression levels will shift fluorescence. We present a new perspective on the phenotype of SP cells at the single-cell level that is determined by biological and experimental kinetic processes, and is not equivalent to a cancer stem cell phenotype.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam F Prasanphanich & Douglas E White & Margaret A Gran & Melissa L Kemp, 2016. "Kinetic Modeling of ABCG2 Transporter Heterogeneity: A Quantitative, Single-Cell Analysis of the Side Population Assay," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-35, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005188
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005188
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005188&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William J. Blake & Mads KÆrn & Charles R. Cantor & J. J. Collins, 2003. "Noise in eukaryotic gene expression," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6932), pages 633-637, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Hongying & Yao, Chengli, 2017. "The influence of internal noise on the detection of hormonal signal with the existence of external noise in a cell system," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 314(C), pages 1-6.
    2. Mohammad Soltani & Cesar A Vargas-Garcia & Duarte Antunes & Abhyudai Singh, 2016. "Intercellular Variability in Protein Levels from Stochastic Expression and Noisy Cell Cycle Processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Chih-Yuan Hsu & Bor-Sen Chen, 2016. "Systematic Design of a Metal Ion Biosensor: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Blasi, Monica Francesca & Casorelli, Ida & Colosimo, Alfredo & Blasi, Francesco Simone & Bignami, Margherita & Giuliani, Alessandro, 2005. "A recursive network approach can identify constitutive regulatory circuits in gene expression data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 348(C), pages 349-370.
    5. Chunjuan Zhu & Zibo Chen & Qiwen Sun, 2022. "Stochastic Transcription with Alterable Synthesis Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Valenti, D. & Tranchina, L. & Brai, M. & Caruso, A. & Cosentino, C. & Spagnolo, B., 2008. "Environmental metal pollution considered as noise: Effects on the spatial distribution of benthic foraminifera in two coastal marine areas of Sicily (Southern Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 449-462.
    7. Tobias May & Lee Eccleston & Sabrina Herrmann & Hansjörg Hauser & Jorge Goncalves & Dagmar Wirth, 2008. "Bimodal and Hysteretic Expression in Mammalian Cells from a Synthetic Gene Circuit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-7, June.
    8. Seyed Yahya Anvar & Allan Tucker & Veronica Vinciotti & Andrea Venema & Gert-Jan B van Ommen & Silvere M van der Maarel & Vered Raz & Peter A C ‘t Hoen, 2011. "Interspecies Translation of Disease Networks Increases Robustness and Predictive Accuracy," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Michael W Klymkowsky & Kathy Garvin-Doxas, 2008. "Recognizing Student Misconceptions through Ed's Tools and the Biology Concept Inventory," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-4, January.
    10. Diana Monteoliva & Christina B McCarthy & Luis Diambra, 2013. "Noise Minimisation in Gene Expression Switches," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Burton W Andrews & Pablo A Iglesias, 2007. "An Information-Theoretic Characterization of the Optimal Gradient Sensing Response of Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-9, August.
    12. Elijah Roberts & Andrew Magis & Julio O Ortiz & Wolfgang Baumeister & Zaida Luthey-Schulten, 2011. "Noise Contributions in an Inducible Genetic Switch: A Whole-Cell Simulation Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, March.
    13. G.-W. Weber & P. Taylan & S. Alparslan-Gök & S. Özöğür-Akyüz & B. Akteke-Öztürk, 2008. "Optimization of gene-environment networks in the presence of errors and uncertainty with Chebychev approximation," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(2), pages 284-318, December.
    14. Marc S Sherman & Barak A Cohen, 2014. "A Computational Framework for Analyzing Stochasticity in Gene Expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Chen, Aimin & Tian, Tianhai & Chen, Yiren & Zhou, Tianshou, 2022. "Stochastic analysis of a complex gene-expression model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Arantxa Urchueguía & Luca Galbusera & Dany Chauvin & Gwendoline Bellement & Thomas Julou & Erik van Nimwegen, 2021. "Genome-wide gene expression noise in Escherichia coli is condition-dependent and determined by propagation of noise through the regulatory network," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Saurabh Modi & Supravat Dey & Abhyudai Singh, 2021. "Noise suppression in stochastic genetic circuits using PID controllers," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, July.
    18. Abhyudai Singh & Mohammad Soltani, 2013. "Quantifying Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variability in Stochastic Gene Expression Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    19. David M Holloway & Alexander V Spirov, 2017. "Transcriptional bursting in Drosophila development: Stochastic dynamics of eve stripe 2 expression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Karl P. Gerhardt & Satyajit D. Rao & Evan J. Olson & Oleg A. Igoshin & Jeffrey J. Tabor, 2021. "Independent control of mean and noise by convolution of gene expression distributions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.