IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Individual Variation in Growth and Its Implication for Life-History and Population Processes Using the Empirical Bayes Method

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Vincenzi
  • Marc Mangel
  • Alain J Crivelli
  • Stephan Munch
  • Hans J Skaug

Abstract

The differences in demographic and life-history processes between organisms living in the same population have important consequences for ecological and evolutionary dynamics. Modern statistical and computational methods allow the investigation of individual and shared (among homogeneous groups) determinants of the observed variation in growth. We use an Empirical Bayes approach to estimate individual and shared variation in somatic growth using a von Bertalanffy growth model with random effects. To illustrate the power and generality of the method, we consider two populations of marble trout Salmo marmoratus living in Slovenian streams, where individually tagged fish have been sampled for more than 15 years. We use year-of-birth cohort, population density during the first year of life, and individual random effects as potential predictors of the von Bertalanffy growth function's parameters k (rate of growth) and (asymptotic size). Our results showed that size ranks were largely maintained throughout marble trout lifetime in both populations. According to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the best models showed different growth patterns for year-of-birth cohorts as well as the existence of substantial individual variation in growth trajectories after accounting for the cohort effect. For both populations, models including density during the first year of life showed that growth tended to decrease with increasing population density early in life. Model validation showed that predictions of individual growth trajectories using the random-effects model were more accurate than predictions based on mean size-at-age of fish.Author Summary: Somatic growth is a crucial determinant of ecological and evolutionary dynamics, since larger organisms often have higher survival and reproductive success. Size may be the result of intrinsic (i.e. genetic), environmental (temperature, food), and social (competition with conspecifics) factors and interaction between them. Knowing the contribution of intrinsic, environmental, and social factors will improve our understanding of individual population dynamics, help conservation and management of endangered species, and increase our ability to predict future growth trajectories of individuals and populations. The latter goal is also relevant for humans, since predicting future growth of newborns may help identify early pathologies that occur later in life. However, teasing apart the contribution of individual and environmental factors requires powerful and efficient statistical methods, as well as biological insights and the use of longitudinal data. We developed a novel statistical approach to estimate and separate the contribution of intrinsic and environmental factors to lifetime growth trajectories, and generate hypotheses concerning the life-history strategies of organisms. Using two fish populations as a case study, we show that our method predicts future growth of organisms with substantially greater accuracy than using historical information on growth at the population level, and help us identify year-class effects, probably associated with climatic vagaries, as the most important environmental determinant of growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Vincenzi & Marc Mangel & Alain J Crivelli & Stephan Munch & Hans J Skaug, 2014. "Determining Individual Variation in Growth and Its Implication for Life-History and Population Processes Using the Empirical Bayes Method," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003828
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003828
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003828&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omori, Koji & Sogabe, Atsushi & Hamaoka, Hideki & Ohnishi, Hidejiro, 2009. "Storage and the regulation of body mass in animals: A general growth equation based on an energy balance model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2618-2623.
    2. Kenneth Pollock, 2002. "The use of auxiliary variables in capture-recapture modelling: An overview," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 85-102.
    3. Skaug, Hans J. & Fournier, David A., 2006. "Automatic approximation of the marginal likelihood in non-Gaussian hierarchical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 699-709, November.
    4. Shizhong Xu, 2007. "An Empirical Bayes Method for Estimating Epistatic Effects of Quantitative Trait Loci," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 513-521, June.
    5. Takao Shohoji & Kouji Kanefuji & Takahiro Sumiya & Tao Qin, 1991. "A prediction of individual growth of height according to an empirical Bayesian approach," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 43(4), pages 607-619, December.
    6. Stephen R. Palumbi, 2004. "Why mothers matter," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7000), pages 621-622, August.
    7. Pedersen, M.W. & Berg, C.W. & Thygesen, U.H. & Nielsen, A. & Madsen, H., 2011. "Estimation methods for nonlinear state-space models in ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1394-1400.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Contreras-Reyes, Javier E. & López Quintero, Freddy O. & Wiff, Rodrigo, 2018. "Bayesian modeling of individual growth variability using back-calculation: Application to pink cusk-eel (Genypterus blacodes) off Chile," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 145-153.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Nan & Cadigan, Noel, 2021. "Frequentist delta-variance approximations with mixed-effects models and TMB," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Oliver, Lauren J. & Morgan, Byron J.T. & Durant, Sarah M. & Pettorelli, Nathalie, 2011. "Individual heterogeneity in recapture probability and survival estimates in cheetah," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 776-784.
    3. Paul S. F. Yip & Hua-Zhen Lin & Liqun Xi, 2005. "A Semiparametric Method for Estimating Population Size for Capture–Recapture Experiments with Random Covariates in Continuous Time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1085-1092, December.
    4. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    5. Ben C. Stevenson & Rachel M. Fewster & Koustubh Sharma, 2022. "Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture–recapture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 963-973, September.
    6. J. Andrew Royle, 2009. "Analysis of Capture–Recapture Models with Individual Covariates Using Data Augmentation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 267-274, March.
    7. Hai-Yan Lü & Xiao-Fen Liu & Shi-Ping Wei & Yuan-Ming Zhang, 2011. "Epistatic Association Mapping in Homozygous Crop Cultivars," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Shiffman, D.S. & Gallagher, A.J. & Wester, J. & Macdonald, C.C. & Thaler, A.D. & Cooke, S.J. & Hammerschlag, N., 2014. "Trophy fishing for species threatened with extinction: A way forward building on a history of conservation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 318-322.
    9. Gilmour, A.R., 2007. "Mixed model regression mapping for QTL detection in experimental crosses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3749-3764, May.
    10. Richard Huggins & Wen‐Han Hwang, 2007. "Non‐parametric estimation of population size from capture–recapture data when the capture probability depends on a covariate," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 56(4), pages 429-443, August.
    11. Wen-Han Hwang & Steve Y. H. Huang, 2003. "Estimation in Capture-Recapture Models When Covariates Are Subject to Measurement Errors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1113-1122, December.
    12. Kristensen, Kasper & Nielsen, Anders & Berg, Casper W. & Skaug, Hans & Bell, Bradley M., 2016. "TMB: Automatic Differentiation and Laplace Approximation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i05).
    13. Solbu, Erik Blystad & Engen, Steinar & Diserud, Ola Håvard, 2015. "Guidelines when estimating temporal changes in density dependent populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 355-376.
    14. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas & Pham Van Ha, 2006. "The Economic Payoffs from Marine Reserves: Resource Rents in a Stochastic Environment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(259), pages 469-480, December.
    15. Sara López-Pintado & Ian W. McKeague, 2013. "Recovering Gradients from Sparsely Observed Functional Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 396-404, June.
    16. Kleppe, Tore Selland & Skaug, Hans Julius, 2012. "Fitting general stochastic volatility models using Laplace accelerated sequential importance sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3105-3119.
    17. Lee, Woojoo & Lim, Johan & Lee, Youngjo & del Castillo, Joan, 2011. "The hierarchical-likelihood approach to autoregressive stochastic volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 248-260, January.
    18. Tahvonen, Olli, 2009. "Economics of harvesting age-structured fish populations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 281-299, November.
    19. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    20. Shen‐Ming Lee & Wen‐Han Hwang & Jean de Dieu Tapsoba, 2016. "Estimation in closed capture–recapture models when covariates are missing at random," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1294-1304, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.