IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combinatorial Gene Regulation Using Auto-Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Rutger Hermsen
  • Bas Ursem
  • Pieter Rein ten Wolde

Abstract

As many as 59% of the transcription factors in Escherichia coli regulate the transcription rate of their own genes. This suggests that auto-regulation has one or more important functions. Here, one possible function is studied. Often the transcription rate of an auto-regulator is also controlled by additional transcription factors. In these cases, the way the expression of the auto-regulator responds to changes in the concentrations of the “input” regulators (the response function) is obviously affected by the auto-regulation. We suggest that, conversely, auto-regulation may be used to optimize this response function. To test this hypothesis, we use an evolutionary algorithm and a chemical–physical model of transcription regulation to design model cis-regulatory constructs with predefined response functions. In these simulations, auto-regulation can evolve if this provides a functional benefit. When selecting for a series of elementary response functions—Boolean logic gates and linear responses—the cis-regulatory regions resulting from the simulations indeed often exploit auto-regulation. Surprisingly, the resulting constructs use auto-activation rather than auto-repression. Several design principles show up repeatedly in the simulation results. They demonstrate how auto-activation can be used to generate sharp, switch-like activation and repression circuits and how linearly decreasing response functions can be obtained. Auto-repression, on the other hand, resulted only when a high response speed or a suppression of intrinsic noise was also selected for. The results suggest that, while auto-repression may primarily be valuable to improve the dynamical properties of regulatory circuits, auto-activation is likely to evolve even when selection acts on the shape of response function only.Author Summary: Bacteria adjust which proteins they make, and how many copies of each kind, depending on their environment. The production rate of each regulated protein is controlled by a special class of proteins called transcription factors. The rate at which a certain protein is produced usually depends on the cellular concentrations of a few such transcription factors. When circumstances change, the concentrations of these transcription factors alter too and consequently the production rates of all proteins regulated by them are adjusted. Interestingly, many transcription factors also regulate their own synthesis rate. This suggests that this self-regulation must have one or more important functions. In this article we study one possible function. In order for cells to function properly each protein concentration has to respond in a particular way to changes in transcription factor concentrations. We have studied how bacteria can optimize and fine-tune these responses. To this end, we formulated a physical model of the regulation by transcription factors and performed computer simulations. These simulations show that self-regulation—and in particular self-activation—is often a useful tool to achieve the prescribed response. Therefore we conclude that natural selection on the regulation of protein levels could naturally lead to self-regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rutger Hermsen & Bas Ursem & Pieter Rein ten Wolde, 2010. "Combinatorial Gene Regulation Using Auto-Regulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000813
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000813
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000813&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Attila Becskei & Luis Serrano, 2000. "Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6786), pages 590-593, June.
    2. Matthew Freeman, 2000. "Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6810), pages 313-319, November.
    3. Mark Ptashne & Alexander Gann, 1997. "Transcriptional activation by recruitment," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6625), pages 569-577, April.
    4. Rutger Hermsen & Sander Tans & Pieter Rein ten Wolde, 2006. "Transcriptional Regulation by Competing Transcription Factor Modules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Michael B. Elowitz & Stanislas Leibler, 2000. "A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 335-338, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rutger Hermsen & David W Erickson & Terence Hwa, 2011. "Speed, Sensitivity, and Bistability in Auto-activating Signaling Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Peipei & Cai, Shuiming & Liu, Zengrong & Chen, Luonan & Wang, Ruiqi, 2013. "Coupling switches and oscillators as a means to shape cellular signals in biomolecular systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-126.
    2. Stefano Ciliberti & Olivier C Martin & Andreas Wagner, 2007. "Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Avraham E Mayo & Yaakov Setty & Seagull Shavit & Alon Zaslaver & Uri Alon, 2006. "Plasticity of the cis-Regulatory Input Function of a Gene," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-1, March.
    4. Tobias May & Lee Eccleston & Sabrina Herrmann & Hansjörg Hauser & Jorge Goncalves & Dagmar Wirth, 2008. "Bimodal and Hysteretic Expression in Mammalian Cells from a Synthetic Gene Circuit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-7, June.
    5. Hui Zhang & Yueling Chen & Yong Chen, 2012. "Noise Propagation in Gene Regulation Networks Involving Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Jin Wang & Bo Huang & Xuefeng Xia & Zhirong Sun, 2006. "Funneled Landscape Leads to Robustness of Cell Networks: Yeast Cell Cycle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-10, November.
    7. Till D Frank & Aimée M Carmody & Boris N Kholodenko, 2012. "Versatility of Cooperative Transcriptional Activation: A Thermodynamical Modeling Analysis for Greater-Than-Additive and Less-Than-Additive Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Ankit Gupta & Mustafa Khammash, 2022. "Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Cencetti, Giulia & Battiston, Federico & Carletti, Timoteo & Fanelli, Duccio, 2020. "Generalized patterns from local and non local reactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Alistair N Boettiger & Peter L Ralph & Steven N Evans, 2011. "Transcriptional Regulation: Effects of Promoter Proximal Pausing on Speed, Synchrony and Reliability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Bottani, Samuel & Grammaticos, Basile, 2008. "A simple model of genetic oscillations through regulated degradation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 1468-1482.
    12. Margherita Carletti & Malay Banerjee, 2019. "A Backward Technique for Demographic Noise in Biological Ordinary Differential Equation Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Weiyue Ji & Handuo Shi & Haoqian Zhang & Rui Sun & Jingyi Xi & Dingqiao Wen & Jingchen Feng & Yiwei Chen & Xiao Qin & Yanrong Ma & Wenhan Luo & Linna Deng & Hanchi Lin & Ruofan Yu & Qi Ouyang, 2013. "A Formalized Design Process for Bacterial Consortia That Perform Logic Computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    14. Konstantinos I Papadimitriou & Guy-Bart V Stan & Emmanuel M Drakakis, 2013. "Systematic Computation of Nonlinear Cellular and Molecular Dynamics with Low-Power CytoMimetic Circuits: A Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Inés P Mariño & Alexey Zaikin & Joaquín Míguez, 2017. "A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Zhdanov, Vladimir P., 2012. "Periodic perturbation of genetic oscillations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 577-587.
    17. Dhiman, Aman & Poria, Swarup, 2018. "Allee effect induced diversity in evolutionary dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 32-38.
    18. Javier Santos-Moreno & Eve Tasiudi & Hadiastri Kusumawardhani & Joerg Stelling & Yolanda Schaerli, 2023. "Robustness and innovation in synthetic genotype networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. T. Ochiai & J. C. Nacher, 2007. "Stochastic analysis of autoregulatory gene expression dynamics," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 377-388, November.
    20. Kyung H Kim & Herbert M Sauro, 2012. "Adjusting Phenotypes by Noise Control," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.