IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonidentifiability of the Source of Intrinsic Noise in Gene Expression from Single-Burst Data

Author

Listed:
  • Piers J Ingram
  • Michael P H Stumpf
  • Jaroslav Stark

Abstract

Over the last few years, experimental data on the fluctuations in gene activity between individual cells and within the same cell over time have confirmed that gene expression is a “noisy” process. This variation is in part due to the small number of molecules taking part in some of the key reactions that are involved in gene expression. One of the consequences of this is that protein production often occurs in bursts, each due to a single promoter or transcription factor binding event. Recently, the distribution of the number of proteins produced in such bursts has been experimentally measured, offering a unique opportunity to study the relative importance of different sources of noise in gene expression. Here, we provide a derivation of the theoretical probability distribution of these bursts for a wide variety of different models of gene expression. We show that there is a good fit between our theoretical distribution and that obtained from two different published experimental datasets. We then prove that, irrespective of the details of the model, the burst size distribution is always geometric and hence determined by a single parameter. Many different combinations of the biochemical rates for the constituent reactions of both transcription and translation will therefore lead to the same experimentally observed burst size distribution. It is thus impossible to identify different sources of fluctuations purely from protein burst size data or to use such data to estimate all of the model parameters. We explore methods of inferring these values when additional types of experimental data are available. Author Summary: Recent experimental data showing fluctuations in gene activity between individual cells and within the same cell over time confirm that gene expression is a “noisy” process. This variation is partly due to the small number of molecules involved in gene expression. One consequence is that protein production often occurs in bursts, each due to the binding of a single transcription factor. Recently, the distribution of the number of proteins produced in such bursts has been experimentally measured, offering a unique opportunity to study the relative importance of different sources of noise in gene expression. We derive the theoretical probability distribution of these bursts for a wide variety of gene expression models. We show a good fit between our theoretical distribution and experimental data and prove that, irrespective of the model details, the burst size distribution always has the same shape, determined by a single parameter. As different combinations of the reaction rates lead to the same observed distribution, it is impossible to estimate all kinetic parameters from protein burst size data. When additional data, such as protein equilibrium distributions, are available, these can be used to infer additional parameters. We present one approach to this, demonstrating its application to published data.

Suggested Citation

  • Piers J Ingram & Michael P H Stumpf & Jaroslav Stark, 2008. "Nonidentifiability of the Source of Intrinsic Noise in Gene Expression from Single-Burst Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000192
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000192
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000192&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Long Cai & Nir Friedman & X. Sunney Xie, 2006. "Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7082), pages 358-362, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sapna Kumari & Jeff Nie & Huann-Sheng Chen & Hao Ma & Ron Stewart & Xiang Li & Meng-Zhu Lu & William M Taylor & Hairong Wei, 2012. "Evaluation of Gene Association Methods for Coexpression Network Construction and Biological Knowledge Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Niraj Kumar & Abhyudai Singh & Rahul V Kulkarni, 2015. "Transcriptional Bursting in Gene Expression: Analytical Results for General Stochastic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Marc S Sherman & Barak A Cohen, 2014. "A Computational Framework for Analyzing Stochasticity in Gene Expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Soltani & Cesar A Vargas-Garcia & Duarte Antunes & Abhyudai Singh, 2016. "Intercellular Variability in Protein Levels from Stochastic Expression and Noisy Cell Cycle Processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Lee, Julian, 2023. "Poisson distributions in stochastic dynamics of gene expression: What events do they count?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).
    3. Jérémie Bourdon & Damien Eveillard & Anne Siegel, 2011. "Integrating Quantitative Knowledge into a Qualitative Gene Regulatory Network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Yann S Dufour & Sébastien Gillet & Nicholas W Frankel & Douglas B Weibel & Thierry Emonet, 2016. "Direct Correlation between Motile Behavior and Protein Abundance in Single Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Shu Wang & Jia-Ren Lin & Eduardo D Sontag & Peter K Sorger, 2019. "Inferring reaction network structure from single-cell, multiplex data, using toric systems theory," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Paolo Annibale & Stefano Vanni & Marco Scarselli & Ursula Rothlisberger & Aleksandra Radenovic, 2011. "Quantitative Photo Activated Localization Microscopy: Unraveling the Effects of Photoblinking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-8, July.
    7. Bar Haim Y. & Booth James G. & Wells Martin T., 2012. "A Mixture-Model Approach for Parallel Testing for Unequal Variances," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Vera Bettenworth & Simon Vliet & Bartosz Turkowyd & Annika Bamberger & Heiko Wendt & Matthew McIntosh & Wieland Steinchen & Ulrike Endesfelder & Anke Becker, 2022. "Frequency modulation of a bacterial quorum sensing response," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Jonathan Liu & Donald Hansen & Elizabeth Eck & Yang Joon Kim & Meghan Turner & Simon Alamos & Hernan Garcia, 2021. "Real-time single-cell characterization of the eukaryotic transcription cycle reveals correlations between RNA initiation, elongation, and cleavage," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Robert J Prill & Robert Vogel & Guillermo A Cecchi & Grégoire Altan-Bonnet & Gustavo Stolovitzky, 2015. "Noise-Driven Causal Inference in Biomolecular Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Karl P. Gerhardt & Satyajit D. Rao & Evan J. Olson & Oleg A. Igoshin & Jeffrey J. Tabor, 2021. "Independent control of mean and noise by convolution of gene expression distributions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Villaseñor, José A. & González-Estrada, Elizabeth, 2015. "A variance ratio test of fit for Gamma distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 281-286.
    13. Hao Ge & Pingping Wu & Hong Qian & Xiaoliang Sunney Xie, 2018. "Relatively slow stochastic gene-state switching in the presence of positive feedback significantly broadens the region of bimodality through stabilizing the uninduced phenotypic state," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Niraj Kumar & Abhyudai Singh & Rahul V Kulkarni, 2015. "Transcriptional Bursting in Gene Expression: Analytical Results for General Stochastic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Wadhwa, R.R. & Zalányi, L. & Szente, J. & Négyessy, L. & Érdi, P., 2017. "Stochastic kinetics of the circular gene hypothesis: Feedback effects and protein fluctuations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 326-336.
    16. Benjamin B Kaufmann & Qiong Yang & Jerome T Mettetal & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2007. "Heritable Stochastic Switching Revealed by Single-Cell Genealogy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.