Author
Listed:
- Stephen Curry
- Eunice Mercado-Lara
- Virginia Arechavala-Gomeza
- C Glenn Begley
- Christophe Bernard
- René Bernard
- Stefano Bertuzzi
- Needhi Bhalla
- Dawn Bowers
- Samuel Brod
- Christopher Chambers
- Michael R Dougherty
- Yensi Flores Bueso
- Stefânia Forner
- Alexandra L J Freeman
- Magali Haas
- Darla P Henderson
- Kanika Khanna
- Rebecca Lawrence
- Kif Liakath-Ali
- Christine Liu
- Neil Malhotra
- José G Merino
- Edward Miguel
- Rachel Miles
- Mary Munson
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- Robert Nobles
- Joy Owango
- Michel Tuan Pham
- Gina Poe
- Alexandra N Ramirez
- Sarvenaz Sarabipour
- Jill L Silverman
- Laura N Smith
- P Sriramarao
- Paul W Sternberg
- Geeta K Swamy
- Malú Gámez Tansey
- Gonzalo E Torres
- Erick H Turner
- Lauren von Klinggraeff
- Frances Weis-Garcia
Abstract
Sharing knowledge is a basic tenet of the scientific community, yet publication bias arising from the reluctance or inability to publish negative or null results remains a long-standing and deep-seated problem, albeit one that varies in severity between disciplines and study types. Recognizing that previous endeavors to address the issue have been fragmentary and largely unsuccessful, this Consensus View proposes concrete and concerted measures that major stakeholders can take to create and incentivize new pathways for publishing negative results. Funders, research institutions, publishers, learned societies, and the research community all have a role in making this an achievable norm that will buttress public trust in science.Sharing knowledge is a fundamental principle within the scientific community, yet null and negative results are still being underreported. This Consensus View discusses the problem of such publication bias and presents a roadmap to a solution that has a role for everyone in the scientific community in promoting knowledge sharing, research transparency and rigor.
Suggested Citation
Stephen Curry & Eunice Mercado-Lara & Virginia Arechavala-Gomeza & C Glenn Begley & Christophe Bernard & René Bernard & Stefano Bertuzzi & Needhi Bhalla & Dawn Bowers & Samuel Brod & Christopher Chamb, 2025.
"Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results,"
PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(9), pages 1-10, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003368
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003368
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.