IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/0030222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Density-Dependent Demographic Variation Determines Extinction Rate of Experimental Populations

Author

Listed:
  • John M Drake

Abstract

Understanding population extinctions is a chief goal of ecological theory. While stochastic theories of population growth are commonly used to forecast extinction, models used for prediction have not been adequately tested with experimental data. In a previously published experiment, variation in available food was experimentally manipulated in 281 laboratory populations of Daphnia magna to test hypothesized effects of environmental variation on population persistence. Here, half of those data were used to select and fit a stochastic model of population growth to predict extinctions of populations in the other half. When density-dependent demographic stochasticity was detected and incorporated in simple stochastic models, rates of population extinction were accurately predicted or only slightly biased. However, when density-dependent demographic stochasticity was not accounted for, as is usual when forecasting extinction of threatened and endangered species, predicted extinction rates were severely biased. Thus, an experimental demonstration shows that reliable estimates of extinction risk may be obtained for populations in variable environments if high-quality data are available for model selection and if density-dependent demographic stochasticity is accounted for. These results suggest that further consideration of density-dependent demographic stochasticity is required if predicted extinction rates are to be relied upon for conservation planning. Manipulating the environment of Daphnia reveals that extinction risk can be reliably predicted only if density-dependent demographic stochasticity is included and that traditional models ignoring this underestimate the risk of extinction.

Suggested Citation

  • John M Drake, 2005. "Density-Dependent Demographic Variation Determines Extinction Rate of Experimental Populations," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-1, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0030222
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030222&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry W. Brook & Julian J. O'Grady & Andrew P. Chapman & Mark A. Burgman & H. Resit Akçakaya & Richard Frankham, 2000. "Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6776), pages 385-387, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kjær, Lene J. & Schauber, Eric M., 2022. "The effect of landscape, transmission mode and social behavior on disease transmission: Simulating the transmission of chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    2. Erickson, Richard A. & Cox, Stephen B. & Oates, Jessica L. & Anderson, Todd A. & Salice, Christopher J. & Long, Kevin R., 2014. "A Daphnia population model that considers pesticide exposure and demographic stochasticity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 37-47.
    3. Abadi, Fitsum & Gimenez, Olivier & Jakober, Hans & Stauber, Wolfgang & Arlettaz, Raphaël & Schaub, Michael, 2012. "Estimating the strength of density dependence in the presence of observation errors using integrated population models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1-9.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2016. "Population viability of recolonizing cougars in midwestern North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 121-129.
    2. D.C & Nwankwoala & H. O & Okujagu, 2021. "A Review Of Wetlands And Coastal Resources Of The Niger Delta: Potentials, Challenges And Prospects," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 37-46, March.
    3. Skvortsov, Alex & Ristic, Branko & Kamenev, Alex, 2018. "Predicting population extinction from early observations of the Lotka–Volterra system," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 371-379.
    4. Banks, J.E. & Banks, H.T. & Rinnovatore, K. & Jackson, C.M., 2015. "Optimal sampling frequency and timing of threatened tropical bird populations: A modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 70-77.
    5. Stéphanie C. Schai-Braun & Christine Kowalczyk & Erich Klansek & Klaus Hackländer, 2019. "Estimating Sustainable Harvest Rates for European Hare ( Lepus Europaeus ) Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Wigley, Tom M.L. & Hong, Sanghyun & Brook, Barry W., 2021. "Value-added diagnostics for the assessment and validation of integrated assessment models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Marco D Visser & Sean M McMahon & Cory Merow & Philip M Dixon & Sydne Record & Eelke Jongejans, 2015. "Speeding Up Ecological and Evolutionary Computations in R; Essentials of High Performance Computing for Biologists," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    8. John M Halley & Kyle S Van Houtan & Nate Mantua, 2018. "How survival curves affect populations’ vulnerability to climate change," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Kissel, Amanda M. & Palen, Wendy J. & Govindarajulu, Purnima, 2017. "A Decision-theory Approach to Cost-effective Population Supplementation for Imperiled Species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 194-202.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0030222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.