IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Sustainability Reporting Performance In Poland: Empirical Evidence From The Wig 20 And Mwig 40 Companies

  • Avo Schönbohm


    (Berlin School of Economics and Law)

  • Astupan D.

    (Berlin School of Economics and Law)

Registered author(s):

    The aim of this research is to analyse to what extent Polish companies conform to international sustainability reporting standards. Furthermore, this study seeks to assess whether they are aware about sustainability dimensions or whether they use sustainability reporting simply as a tool for good reputation and marketing. Therefore, a scoring model was developed to assess the sustainability reports from all companies of the WIG 20 and mWIG 40.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management in its journal Polish Journal of Management Studies.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 (December)
    Pages: 68-80

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:68-80
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Greiwe, Joris & Schönbohm, Avo, 2011. "A KPI based study on the scope and quality of sustainability reporting by the DAX30 companies," Working Papers 64, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB), Berlin School of Economics and Law.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:68-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paula Bajdor)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.