IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04209-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commodifying the microbial self: microbiome-based personalization and the quest for symbiotic singularity

Author

Listed:
  • Rafi Grosglik

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

  • Dan M. Kotliar

    (University of Haifa)

Abstract

Research on the human microbiome has highlighted human-microbe interdependence, thus heralding a fundamental epistemic shift from a modernistic human individuality towards homo-microbial symbioticism. This shift is largely afforded by machine-learning algorithms that have also led to the popularization and commodification of this new episteme. Startup companies have accordingly begun developing microbiome-based AI-powered products, offering consumers access to personalized insights from their allegedly unique homo-microbial identities. Based on the case study of a successful startup that offers to algorithmically leverage people’s microbial states for personalized nutrition, we ask: How do users of microbiome-based personalized services perceive the homo-microbial identity? How do they interpret the algorithmic systems involved in these services? And how do these two epistemes—microbial and algorithmic—inform their understanding of their body, self, and agency? We show that such technologies promise consumers a “symbiotic singularity”—a unique, incommensurable homo-microbial identity that affords highly personalized recommendations. Nevertheless, while consumers initially accept this identity, they eventually “scale back” to a more conventional, modernistic view of themselves as humans, questioning both microbiome science’s symbioticism and its AI-powered singularity. Our findings highlight the implications of the commodification of microbiome science, reflecting broader concerns about the ways in which post-human epistemes are being embraced, proliferated, and commodified through the emerging field of data-driven personalized medicine and health solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafi Grosglik & Dan M. Kotliar, 2024. "Commodifying the microbial self: microbiome-based personalization and the quest for symbiotic singularity," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04209-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04209-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04209-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04209-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Lupton, 2014. "Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Lucien Karpik, 2010. "Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9215.
    3. Cruz, Taylor Marion, 2022. "The social life of biomedical data: Capturing, obscuring, and envisioning care in the digital safety-net," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    4. Beth Greenhough & Andrew Dwyer & Richard Grenyer & Timothy Hodgetts & Carmen McLeod & Jamie Lorimer, 2018. "Unsettling antibiosis: how might interdisciplinary researchers generate a feeling for the microbiome and to what effect?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Nafus, Dawn, 2019. "Data Aggregation as Social Relations: Making Datasets from Self-Tracking Data," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 440-454, July.
    6. Beth Greenhough & Cressida Jervis Read & Jamie Lorimer & Javier Lezaun & Carmen McLeod & Amber Benezra & Sally Bloomfield & Tim Brown & Megan Clinch & Fulvio D’Acquisto & Anna Dumitriu & Joshua Evans , 2020. "Setting the agenda for social science research on the human microbiome," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Eran Fisher & Zeev Rosenhek, 2022. "Engendering assemblages: the constitution of digital health data as an epistemic consumption object," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 599-616, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:drcuw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bradshaw, Aaron, 2023. "The invisible city: The unglamorous biogeographies of urban microbial ecologies," SocArXiv drcuw, Center for Open Science.
    3. David M. Waguespack & Robert Salomon, 2016. "Quality, Subjectivity, and Sustained Superior Performance at the Olympic Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 286-300, January.
    4. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    5. Mariagiulia Mariani & François Casabianca & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2021. "Protecting Food Cultural Biodiversity: From Theory to Practice. Challenging the Geographical Indications and the Slow Food Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Lenore Manderson, 2020. "Prescribing, care and resistance: antibiotic use in urban South Africa," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Isabelle Bouty & Marie-Léandre Gomez & Carole Drucker-Godard, 2013. "Maintaining an Institution : The Institutional Work of Michelin in Haute Cuisine around the World," Working Papers hal-00782455, HAL.
    8. Jason Potts & John Hartley, 2015. "How the Social Economy Produces Innovation," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 263-282, September.
    9. Liesbeth Strooper & Erwin Dekker, 2024. "Why the Impressionists did not create Impressionism," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(2), pages 171-198, June.
    10. Enric Senabre Hidalgo & Mad P. Ball & Morgane Opoix & Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, 2022. "Shared motivations, goals and values in the practice of personal science: a community perspective on self-tracking for empirical knowledge," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Pollock, Neil & D’Adderio, Luciana, 2012. "Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 565-586.
    12. Boedker, Christina & Chong, Kar-Ming & Mouritsen, Jan, 2020. "The counter-performativity of calculative practices: Mobilising rankings of intellectual capital," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Gerhard Rainer, 2021. "Geographies of qualification in the global fine wine market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 95-112, February.
    14. Gernot Grabher, 2018. "Marginality as strategy: Leveraging peripherality for creativity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(8), pages 1785-1794, November.
    15. Fabien Eloire & Jean Finez, 2023. "Prices as social facts: A sociological approach to price setting," Post-Print hal-03816307, HAL.
    16. Julian Hamann & Frerk Blome & Anna Kosmützky, 2022. "Devices of evaluation: Institutionalization and impact—Introduction to the special issue," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 423-428.
    17. Ana, Daniela, 2024. "Nature’s value: Evidencing a Moldovan terroir through scientific infrastructures," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 89(2), pages 237-252.
    18. Jean-Marc Touzard & Yuna Chiffoleau & Camille Maffezzoli, 2016. "What Is Local or Global about Wine? An Attempt to Objectivize a Social Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Beckert, Jens & Rössel, Jörg & Schenk, Patrick, 2014. "Wine as a cultural product: Symbolic capital and price formation in the wine field," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. David A. Harper, 2021. "Entrepreneurial aesthetics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 55-80, March.
    21. Armstrong, David, 2023. "The social life of risk probabilities in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04209-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.