IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v14y2012i3p334-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A revenue management slot allocation model for liner shipping networks

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Zurheide

    (Institute for Operations Research and Information Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstr. 95 D, 21073 Hamburg, Germany.)

  • Kathrin Fischer

    (Institute for Operations Research and Information Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstr. 95 D, 21073 Hamburg, Germany.)

Abstract

The use of revenue management methods is still an up and coming topic in the liner shipping industry. In many liner shipping companies, decisions on container bookings are made by skilled employees without, or with little use of, decision support systems. Also in the literature, only a few publications on the topic of revenue management in the liner shipping industry can be found. Most of the models that have been suggested so far consider only one service and one ship cycle on this service. However, in liner shipping, it is important to consider the possibility of transhipment between services and of different demand situations at different times. Moreover, drawing inferences from similar developments in other industries and the literature, it seems promising to create a segmentation that divides container bookings into urgent and non-urgent cargo. This segmentation gives the customers more control over their cargo, and the carrier can gain additional revenue through extra charges. To achieve that aim, the carrier needs to keep some slots available until closing time, so he can offer slots on the next ship to customers with urgent cargo. On the basis of these facts, a new quantitative slot allocation model is developed that takes into account priority service segmentation, the network structure of liner shipping with the possibility of transhipment, and the existence of different ship cycles on the services. In contrast to the existing models, this approach leads to a more realistic representation of the situation in liner shipping. The booking limits resulting from the model can be used to decide whether a booking should be accepted or rejected in favour of a possible later and potentially more beneficial booking. A simulation study is done to test the model for different demand scenarios, which leads to promising results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Zurheide & Kathrin Fischer, 2012. "A revenue management slot allocation model for liner shipping networks," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(3), pages 334-361, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:14:y:2012:i:3:p:334-361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v14/n3/pdf/mel201211a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v14/n3/full/mel201211a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2014. "Empirical analysis of the container liner shipping network on the East-West corridor (1995–2011)," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 121-153, November.
    2. Goh, Shao Hung & Chan, Yuxian, 2016. "Operational shadow pricing in back haul container shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 3-15.
    3. Hua-An Lu & Wen-Hung Mu, 2016. "A slot reallocation model for containership schedule adjustment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 136-157, January.
    4. repec:eee:proeco:v:193:y:2017:i:c:p:259-271 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:14:y:2012:i:3:p:334-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.