IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v55y2004i2d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible versus fixed timetabling: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • M Bazargan-Lari

    (Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University)

Abstract

This case study presents the timetabling problem of the Flight Training Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. The problem consists of scheduling the flight resources to students to various time blocks. This problem represents a well-studied field in operations research, mainly adopting variations of mathematical programming models. This paper initially presents the efforts towards developing a fixed timetable using optimization models for the case under study. It is, however, demonstrated that implementation of optimum solutions obtained using this approach cannot be sustained, mainly because of the dynamic nature of the governing parameters. A flexible and dynamic timetable utilizing the university computer network, allowing the instructors and students to make their own decentralized flexible timetables, is proposed. A simulation study is initiated to compare the performance measures under both timetables. The analysis shows that implementation of a flexible system generates higher utilization of flight resources as well as improving key performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • M Bazargan-Lari, 2004. "Flexible versus fixed timetabling: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 123-131, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:55:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601651
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601651
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knut Haase & Jörg Latteier & Andreas Schirmer, 1999. "Course Planning at Lufthansa Technical Training: Constructing More Profitable Schedules," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 95-109, October.
    2. Timothy R. Hinkin & Gary M. Thompson, 2002. "SchedulExpert: Scheduling Courses in the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 45-57, December.
    3. Haase, Knut & Latteier, Jorg & Schirmer, Andreas, 1998. "The course scheduling problem at Lufthansa Technical Training," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 441-456, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K A Willoughby & C J Zappe, 2006. "A methodology to optimize foundation seminar assignments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(8), pages 950-956, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schirmer, Andreas & Potzhar, Kathrin, 2001. "Professional course scheduling in airline transport pilot training: A case from Lufthansa flight training," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 539, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    2. Schirmer, Andreas & Potzahr, Kathrin, 2001. "Lehrgangsplanung für die Ausbildung von Verkehrsflugzeugführern: Ergebnisse einer Studie bei Lufthansa Flight Training," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 538, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    3. Kozanidis, George, 2017. "Optimal assignment of aircrew trainees to simulator and classroom training sessions subject to seniority and preference restrictions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 143-154.
    4. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre (Ed.), 2000. "Jahresbericht 1999," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 522, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    5. Schirmer, Armin, 1998. "Adaptive control schemes for parameterized heuristic scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 488, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Christopher Garcia, 2019. "Practice Summary: Managing Capacity at the University of Mary Washington’s College of Business," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 167-171, March.
    7. Gang Yu & Julian Pachon & Benjamin Thengvall & Darryal Chandler & Al Wilson, 2004. "Optimizing Pilot Planning and Training for Continental Airlines," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 253-264, August.
    8. Xiangtong Qi & Jonathan F. Bard & Gang Yu, 2004. "Class Scheduling for Pilot Training," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 148-162, February.
    9. Biniyam Asmare Kassa, 2015. "Implementing a Class-Scheduling System at the College of Business and Economics of Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 203-215, June.
    10. Drezet, L.-E. & Billaut, J.-C., 2008. "A project scheduling problem with labour constraints and time-dependent activities requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 217-225, March.
    11. Amy B. Gore & Mary E. Kurz & Matthew J. Saltzman & Blake Splitter & William C. Bridges & Neil J. Calkin, 2022. "Clemson University’s Rotational Attendance Plan During COVID-19," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 553-567, November.
    12. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre (Ed.), 1999. "Jahresbericht 1998," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 495, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani, 2020. "Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling with Student Flow, Soft Constraints, and Smoothing Objectives: an Application to a Real Case Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    15. K A Willoughby & C J Zappe, 2006. "A methodology to optimize foundation seminar assignments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(8), pages 950-956, August.
    16. Clarence H. Martin, 2004. "Ohio University's College of Business Uses Integer Programming to Schedule Classes," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 460-465, December.
    17. Jaime Miranda, 2010. "eClasSkeduler: A Course Scheduling System for the Executive Education Unit at the Universidad de Chile," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 196-207, June.
    18. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    19. Schirmer, Andreas, 1999. "Fast iterative improvement methods for project scheduling under partially renewable resources," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 501, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    20. Aslan, Ayse & Ursavas, Evrim & Romeijnders, Ward, 2023. "A Precedence Constrained Knapsack Problem with Uncertain Item Weights for Personalized Learning Systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:55:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.