IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorapm/v15y2016i2d10.1057_rpm.2016.22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bid-price behavior in network RM: Forecast decrementing and bid-price bounding

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Bockelie

    (MIT International Center for Air Transportation)

  • Peter Belobaba

    (MIT International Center for Air Transportation)

Abstract

This article investigates two practical concerns with bid-price control origin–destination (OD) revenue management (RM) systems. First, we examine forecast decrementing methods for the common situation where demand forecast generation is decoupled from booking policy optimization. Second, we explore the impacts of two bounding schemes designed to eliminate bid price declines close to departure. Using the Passenger Origin–Destination Simulator (PODS), we find (i) more sophisticated forecast decrements increase revenue compared with the traditional approach when combined with advanced forecasting methods incorporating passenger willingness to pay and (ii) bid price bounds increase revenue with standard forecasting methods but decrease revenue with advanced forecasting methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Bockelie & Peter Belobaba, 2016. "Bid-price behavior in network RM: Forecast decrementing and bid-price bounding," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 95-106, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:15:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1057_rpm.2016.22
    DOI: 10.1057/rpm.2016.22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/rpm.2016.22
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/rpm.2016.22?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 1998. "An Analysis of Bid-Price Controls for Network Revenue Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1577-1593, November.
    2. Peter P. Belobaba, 1989. "OR Practice—Application of a Probabilistic Decision Model to Airline Seat Inventory Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, April.
    3. Conrad J. Lautenbacher & Shaler Stidham, 1999. "The Underlying Markov Decision Process in the Single-Leg Airline Yield-Management Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 136-146, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Zhang & William L. Cooper, 2005. "Revenue Management for Parallel Flights with Customer-Choice Behavior," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 415-431, June.
    2. William L. Cooper, 2002. "Asymptotic Behavior of an Allocation Policy for Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 720-727, August.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sanne de Boer, 2005. "Simulation-Based Booking Limits for Airline Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 90-106, February.
    4. Sebastian Koch & Jochen Gönsch & Claudius Steinhardt, 2017. "Dynamic Programming Decomposition for Choice-Based Revenue Management with Flexible Products," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1046-1062, November.
    5. Dawsen Hwang & Patrick Jaillet & Vahideh Manshadi, 2021. "Online Resource Allocation Under Partially Predictable Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 895-915, May.
    6. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2004. "Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 15-33, January.
    7. Maddah, Bacel & Moussawi-Haidar, Lama & El-Taha, Muhammad & Rida, Hussein, 2010. "Dynamic cruise ship revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 445-455, November.
    8. Chatwin, Richard E., 2000. "Optimal dynamic pricing of perishable products with stochastic demand and a finite set of prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 149-174, August.
    9. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Dan Zhang, 2015. "Reductions of Approximate Linear Programs for Network Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1352-1371, December.
    10. Christopher P. Wright & Harry Groenevelt & Robert A. Shumsky, 2010. "Dynamic Revenue Management in Airline Alliances," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 15-37, February.
    11. Guillermo Gallego & Robert Phillips, 2004. "Revenue Management of Flexible Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 321-337, January.
    12. Wang, Weidi & Tang, Ou & Huo, Jiazhen, 2018. "Dynamic capacity allocation for airlines with multi-channel distribution," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 173-181.
    13. Jeffrey I. McGill & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 1999. "Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 233-256, May.
    14. Thomas Fiig & Remy Guen & Mathilde Gauchet, 2018. "Dynamic pricing of airline offers," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(6), pages 381-393, December.
    15. Felix Papier, 2016. "Supply Allocation Under Sequential Advance Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 341-361, April.
    16. Michael Z. F. Li & Tae H. Oum, 2002. "A Note on the Single Leg, Multifare Seat Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 349-353, August.
    17. E. Andrew Boyd & Ioana C. Bilegan, 2003. "Revenue Management and E-Commerce," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1363-1386, October.
    18. Thomas Spengler & Stefan Rehkopf, 2005. "Revenue Management Konzepte zur Entscheidungsunterstützung bei der Annahme von Kundenaufträgen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 123-146, June.
    19. Yingjie Lan & Huina Gao & Michael O. Ball & Itir Karaesmen, 2008. "Revenue Management with Limited Demand Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1594-1609, September.
    20. Peter P Belobaba, 2016. "Optimization models in RM systems: Optimality versus revenue gains," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(3), pages 229-235, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:15:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1057_rpm.2016.22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.