IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v25y2022i4d10.1057_s41299-021-00128-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Stakeholders’ Perspective of Reputation Dimensions for Service Organisations: Evidence from a Developing Country Context

Author

Listed:
  • Oyindamola Abiola Ajayi

    (North-West University)

  • Tsietsi Mmutle

    (North-West University)

  • Mpho Chaka

    (North-West University)

Abstract

Corporate reputation is widely acknowledged to contribute to business success by academics and business executives. Despite the importance of corporate reputation in all markets, we lack sufficient research into what reputation might mean in the context of companies in developing countries. This paper addresses this lingering gap in the literature by investigating the dimensions that make service organisations reputable from the perspective of four primary stakeholder groups of two large service organisations. The paper also sought to determine whether the same reputation dimensions apply to service organisations in general, or whether they differ according to the type of service organisation. Empirical data were sourced using the mixed-method approach, and analysis revealed 16 items across 6 dimensions that constitute the reputation of service organisations. The study also found that there is not much difference between the reputation dimensions of two organisations used in this study. However, it reveals major differences between the dimensions derived from the developing country context, and those derived from developed contexts. This illustrates that context-specific reputation measures can emerge which are important in understanding how reputation is created and can be managed. Consequently, it underscores the need for more scientific researches into reputation dimensions in different contexts (countries and organisations).

Suggested Citation

  • Oyindamola Abiola Ajayi & Tsietsi Mmutle & Mpho Chaka, 2022. "A Stakeholders’ Perspective of Reputation Dimensions for Service Organisations: Evidence from a Developing Country Context," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 287-299, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:25:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1057_s41299-021-00128-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41299-021-00128-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41299-021-00128-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41299-021-00128-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abrahim Soleimani & William D. Schneper & William Newburry, 2014. "The Impact of Stakeholder Power on Corporate Reputation: A Cross-Country Corporate Governance Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 991-1008, August.
    2. MOHAJAN, Haradhan Kumar, 2017. "Two Criteria For Good Measurements In Research: Validity And Reliability," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 17(4), pages 59-82.
    3. Isabel Olmedo-Cifuentes & Inocencia Martínez-León & Gary Davies, 2014. "Managing internal stakeholders’ views of corporate reputation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(1), pages 83-111, March.
    4. Alan D. Smith & William T. Rupp & Darlene Motley, 2013. "Corporate reputation as strategic competitive advantage of manufacturing and service-based firms: multi-industry case study," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 131-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    2. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2021. "Cradle to Cradle is a Sustainable Economic Policy for the Better Future," MPRA Paper 111334, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Oct 2021.
    3. Thams, Yannick & Alvarado-Vargas, Marcelo J. & Newburry, William, 2016. "Geographical diversification as a predictor of MNC reputations in their home nations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2882-2889.
    4. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Glaserian Grounded Theory and Straussian Grounded Theory: Two Standard Qualitative Research Approaches in Social Science," MPRA Paper 117017, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Feb 2023.
    5. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    6. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2020. "Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences," MPRA Paper 105149, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Nov 2020.
    7. Antonio Cejudo & Víctor Jesús Moreno-Alcaraz & Riccardo Izzo & Francisco Javier Robles-Palazón & Pilar Sainz de Baranda & Fernando Santonja-Medina, 2020. "Flexibility in Spanish Elite Inline Hockey Players: Profile, Sex, Tightness and Asymmetry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Memo Writing Procedures in Grounded Theory Research Methodology," MPRA Paper 115246, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Aug 2022.
    9. Mona Fairuz Ramli & Salniza Md. Salleh, 2015. "Factors Contributing to Brand Loyalty towards Malaysia Higher Educational Institutions," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 6(3), pages 22-29.
    10. Elena Grimaccia & Alessia Naccarato, 2020. "Confirmatory factor analysis to validate a new measure of food insecurity: perceived and actual constructs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1211-1232, August.
    11. Vicente Lima Crisóstomo & Priscila Azevedo Prudêncio & Isac Freitas Brandão, 2023. "Corporate Reputation in Brazil: The Effects of the Shareholding Control Configuration, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 243-263, November.
    12. Syahrial Syahrial & Sri Winarni, 2021. "Identification Test of Ability to Understand Multiple Representation in Basic Chemistry I Course: Validity and Reliability," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(6), pages 99-104, June.
    13. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2021. "Global COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevention and Protection Techniques," MPRA Paper 106923, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Jan 2021.
    14. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Four Waves of Feminism: A Blessing for Global Humanity," MPRA Paper 114328, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Jul 2022.
    15. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis among Commodities and Prices: A Utility Maximization Perception," MPRA Paper 116232, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Dec 2022.
    16. Jinghan Yuan & Hansong Zou & Kefan Xie & Maxim A. Dulebenets, 2021. "An Assessment of Social Distancing Obedience Behavior during the COVID-19 Post-Epidemic Period in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers," MPRA Paper 116752, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jan 2023.
    18. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "An Overview on the Feminism and Its Categories," MPRA Paper 114625, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Jul 2022.
    19. Mohajan, Devagit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Profit Maximization Strategy in an Industry: A Sustainable Procedure," MPRA Paper 114675, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Jun 2022.
    20. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Mathematical Model for Nonlinear Budget Constraint: Economic Activities on Increased Budget," MPRA Paper 117299, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Mar 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:25:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1057_s41299-021-00128-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.