IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v52y2025i3p418-432..html

The politics of directionality in innovation policy through the lens of policy process frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine de Graaff
  • Iris Wanzenböck
  • Koen Frenken

Abstract

Different interpretations of “directionality” in innovation policy and sustainability transitions literature streams suggest the need for distinguishing between actors “giving direction” contributing to transformative change, and “systemic directionality” emerging through transformative change required to address societal challenges. As an initiation toward bridging these understandings, we emphasize the process-oriented and political nature of directionality and mobilize political theory to conceptualize the politics of directionality. The questions who gives direction, where and how is direction given, which direction is given, and when and why does a direction change (or not) are employed to explore the politics of directionality in an integrative literature review of five policy process frameworks: Multiple Streams Framework, Punctuated Equilibrium Theory, Policy Feedback Theory, Advocacy Coalition Framework, and the Narrative Policy Framework. We propose an integrated conceptual framework for the analysis of the politics of directionality involving giving direction and processes of systemic directionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine de Graaff & Iris Wanzenböck & Koen Frenken, 2025. "The politics of directionality in innovation policy through the lens of policy process frameworks," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 418-432.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:418-432.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae083
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fulvio Castellacci & Emil Evenhuis & Koen Frenken, 2025. "Geographies of innovation and well-being," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(3), pages 377-394, September.
    2. Juliane Stoye & Michael P. Schlaile & Moritz von Cossel & Stefano Bertacchi & Rita Escórcio & Bastian Winkler & Thomas P. Curran & Laoise Ní Chléirigh & Máire Nic an Bhaird & Jan Bazyli Klakla & Piete, 2025. "Towards More Nuanced Narratives in Bioeconomy Strategies and Policy Documents to Support Knowledge-Driven Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Coenen, Tom B.J. & Wiarda, Martijn & Visscher, Klaasjan & Penna, Caetano C.R. & Volker, Leentje, 2025. "Mission-Oriented Transition Assessment as a reflective approach to mission governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:418-432.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.