IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v219y2025ics0040162525002884.html

Mission-Oriented Transition Assessment as a reflective approach to mission governance

Author

Listed:
  • Coenen, Tom B.J.
  • Wiarda, Martijn
  • Visscher, Klaasjan
  • Penna, Caetano C.R.
  • Volker, Leentje

Abstract

The recent mission-oriented discourse in innovation policy increasingly recognizes the need for participatory, anticipatory, reflexive, and tentative governance modes to address the wickedness associated with societal challenges. In this paper, we introduce the Mission-Oriented Transition Assessment (MOTA) approach as a novel way to collectively anticipate and reflect upon current and future mission-oriented transition dynamics, and we subsequently demonstrate this approach in the context of the Dutch mission ‘Circular infrastructure by 2050’. Using socio-technical scenarios, we apply MOTA to support stakeholders, particularly policymakers, in governing missions. Stakeholders reflect on their role in transitions to collectively find ways to overcome transition barriers and address tensions between the current and future socio-technical systems. Results indicate various ways in which MOTA contributes to stakeholders' awareness and preparedness, as well as the social robustness and alignment of action perspectives in the transition towards a circular infrastructure sector. As such, MOTA helps reveal valuable strategic and actionable insights to better understand and address societal challenges and mission barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Coenen, Tom B.J. & Wiarda, Martijn & Visscher, Klaasjan & Penna, Caetano C.R. & Volker, Leentje, 2025. "Mission-Oriented Transition Assessment as a reflective approach to mission governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002884
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525002884
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florian Wittmann & Miriam Hufnagl & Ralf Lindner & Florian Roth & Jakob Edler, 2021. "Governing varieties of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new typology," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 727-738.
    2. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    3. Smith, Adrian & Raven, Rob, 2012. "What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1025-1036.
    4. Hermann, Roberto Rivas & Pansera, Mario & Nogueira, Leticia Antunes & Monteiro, Marko, 2022. "Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Matthijs J. Janssen & Jonas Torrens & Joeri H. Wesseling & Iris Wanzenböck, 2021. "The promises and premises of mission-oriented innovation policy—A reflection and ways forward," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 438-444.
    6. Brit M Bulah & Barbara van Mierlo & Koen Beumer & Alwin L Gerritsen & Simona O Negro & Marko P Hekkert & Laurens Klerkx, 2024. "Diversity and directionality: friends or foes in sustainability transitions?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1075-1092.
    7. Laatsit, Mart & Grillitsch, Markus & Fünfschilling, Lea, 2025. "Great expectations: The promises and limits of innovation policy in addressing societal challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    8. Helga Nowotny, 2003. "Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 151-156, June.
    9. Philippe Larrue & Piret Tõnurist & David Jonason, 2024. "Monitoring and evaluation of mission-oriented innovation policies: From theory to practice," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2024/09, OECD Publishing.
    10. Wittmann, Florian & Hufnagl, Miriam & Lindner, Ralf & Roth, Florian & Edler, Jakob, 2020. "Developing a typology for mission-oriented innovation policies," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 64, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    11. Tom B. J. Coenen & Klaasjan Visscher & Leentje Volker, 2023. "A systemic perspective on transition barriers to a circular infrastructure sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 22-43, January.
    12. Stilgoe, Jack & Owen, Richard & Macnaghten, Phil, 2013. "Developing a framework for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1568-1580.
    13. Lehoux, P. & Miller, F.A. & Williams-Jones, B., 2020. "Anticipatory governance and moral imagination: Methodological insights from a scenario-based public deliberation study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel, 2012. "Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 980-995.
    15. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    16. Wiarda, Martijn & van de Kaa, Geerten & Yaghmaei, Emad & Doorn, Neelke, 2021. "A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Matthijs J Janssen & Joeri Wesseling & Jonas Torrens & K Matthias & Caetano Penna & Laurens Klerkx, 2023. "Missions as boundary objects for transformative change: understanding coordination across policy, research, and stakeholder communities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 398-415.
    18. Fisher, Erik, 2005. "Lessons learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications program (ELSI): Planning societal implications research for the National Nanotechnology Program," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 321-328.
    19. Truffer, Bernhard & Schippl, Jens & Fleischer, Torsten, 2017. "Decentering technology in technology assessment: prospects for socio-technical transitions in electric mobility in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-48.
    20. Holger Hoffmann-Riem & Brian Wynne, 2002. "In risk assessment, one has to admit ignorance," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6877), pages 123-123, March.
    21. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    22. Joeri Wesseling & Nick Meijerhof, 2023. "Towards a Mission-oriented Innovation Systems (MIS) approach, application for Dutch sustainable maritime shipping," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-28, August.
    23. Helen Pallett & Jason Chilvers, 2013. "A Decade of Learning about Publics, Participation, and Climate Change: Institutionalising Reflexivity?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(5), pages 1162-1183, May.
    24. Sabine de Graaff & Iris Wanzenböck & Koen Frenken, 2025. "The politics of directionality in innovation policy through the lens of policy process frameworks," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 418-432.
    25. Stefan Kuhlmann & Arie Rip, 2018. "Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 448-454.
    26. Behnam Taebi & Jan H. Kwakkel & Céline Kermisch, 2020. "Governing climate risks in the face of normative uncertainties," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    27. Jentoft, Svein & Chuenpagdee, Ratana, 2009. "Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 553-560, July.
    28. Karlijn Muiderman & Aarti Gupta & Joost Vervoort & Frank Biermann, 2020. "Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: Different conceptions of the future and implications for the present," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.
    29. Ross Brown, 2021. "Mission-oriented or mission adrift? A critical examination of mission-oriented innovation policies," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 739-761, April.
    30. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 180.
    31. Alejandra Boni & Diana Velasco & Jordi Molas-Gallart & Johan Schot, 2023. "Evaluating transformative innovation policy in a formative way: Insights from Vinnova’s food mission experiment," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 577-590.
    32. Laurens Klerkx & Stephanie Begemann & Matthijs Janssen, 2025. "Mission cocreation or domination? Explorative and exploitative forces in shaping the Dutch circular agriculture mission," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 128-145.
    33. Jakob Edler & Katrin Ostertag & Johanna Schuler, 2024. "Social innovation, transformation, and public policy: towards a conceptualization and critical appraisal," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 80-88.
    34. McLaren, Julie & Kattel, Rainer, 2025. "Policy capacities for mission-oriented innovation policy: A case study of UKRI and the industrial strategy challenge fund," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    35. Effie Amanatidou & Maurits Butter & Vicente Carabias & Totti Könnölä & Miriam Leis & Ozcan Saritas & Petra Schaper-Rinkel & Victor van Rij, 2012. "On concepts and methods in horizon scanning: Lessons from initiating policy dialogues on emerging issues," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 208-221, March.
    36. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel & Josh Ryan-Collins, 2020. "Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-437, June.
    37. Kuhlmann, Stefan & Stegmaier, Peter & Konrad, Kornelia, 2019. "The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1091-1097.
    38. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    39. Elizabeth Shove & Gordon Walker, 2007. "Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-770, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiarda, Martijn & Sobota, Vladimir C.M. & Janssen, Matthijs J. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Yaghmaei, Emad & Doorn, Neelke, 2023. "Public participation in mission-oriented innovation projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Laatsit, Mart & Grillitsch, Markus & Fünfschilling, Lea, 2025. "Great expectations: The promises and limits of innovation policy in addressing societal challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    3. Fielke, Simon & Fleming, Aysha & Jakku, Emma & Stitzlein, Cara & Ricketts, Katie & Cornish, Gillian & Snow, Stephen & Bonnett, Graham, 2025. "“The end point is a… more appropriate innovation ecosystem” Mission-oriented and responsible innovation in Australian agricultural systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Komninos, Nicos & Panori, Anastasia, 2025. "Smart carbon–neutral development: Embracing complexity with multi-level governance and convolution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Edler, Jakob & Helfrich, Florian & Kuhlmann, Stefan, 2025. "Fostering transformation: A governance frame for large public and private organisations as change agents in transformations," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 90, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    7. Avdeitchikova, Sofia & Schwaag Serger, Sylvia, 2024. "Innovation policy as an instrument for driving transformation – lessons from practice," Papers in Innovation Studies 2024/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    8. Matthijs Janssen & Philip McCann & Johan Stierna, 2026. "Building traction for challenge-led innovation policy: the promise of local missions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 75(1), pages 1-23, March.
    9. MCCANN Philip & JANSSEN Matthijs & STIERNA Johan, 2024. "Can ‘local missions’ play a role in linking climate change mitigation and Cohesion policies?," JRC Research Reports JRC139535, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Janssen, Matthijs & Wanzenböck, Iris & Fünfschilling, Lea & Pontinakis, Dimitris, 2023. "Governance arrangements for the implementation of transformative innovation policy: Insights from a comparative case study," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/13, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    11. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    12. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:450-468 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Chen, Kaihua & Xue, Zehua & Guo, Rui & Ning, Lutao, 2025. "The holistic role of multi-level government in transformative innovation process: Theoretical framework and evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 180.
    15. Kuhlmann, Stefan & Stegmaier, Peter & Konrad, Kornelia, 2019. "The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1091-1097.
    16. Colleen Kaiser & Michal Miedzinski & Will McDowall & Geoffrey R. McCarney, 2024. "Reflective Appraisal of Transformative Innovation Policy: Development of the Sustainability Transition and Innovation Review (STIR) Approach and Application to Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Harald Rohracher & Lars Coenen & Olga Kordas, 2023. "Mission incomplete: Layered practices of monitoring and evaluation in Swedish transformative innovation policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 336-349.
    18. Matthijs J Janssen & Joeri Wesseling & Jonas Torrens & K Matthias & Caetano Penna & Laurens Klerkx, 2023. "Missions as boundary objects for transformative change: understanding coordination across policy, research, and stakeholder communities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 398-415.
    19. Jan Fagerberg & Håkon Endresen Normann, 2022. "Innovation policy, regulation and the transition to net zero," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20220531, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    20. Bentley, Sarah V. & Schleiger, Emma & McCrea, Rod & Coates, Rebecca & Hobman, Elizabeth, 2025. "Public perceptions of responsible innovation: Validation of a scale measuring societal perceptions of responsible innovation in science and technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    21. McLaren, Julie & Kattel, Rainer, 2025. "Policy capacities for mission-oriented innovation policy: A case study of UKRI and the industrial strategy challenge fund," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.