IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v25y2021i3p745-775..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More is Less: Publicizing Information and Market Feedback
[Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects]

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Bird
  • Stephen A Karolyi
  • Thomas G Ruchti
  • Phong Truong

Abstract

We study whether and how publicizing internal information affects the value of financial markets to the real economy. By publicizing corporate filings, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s EDGAR (Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval) web platform reduces the cost of acquiring internal information for outsiders and so makes it relatively less attractive to gather external information. We find that the staggered introduction of EDGAR reduced the sensitivity of firm investment to prices, consistent with prices being less informative to managers due to the crowding out of external information gathering. This crowding out effect is stronger when outsiders’ incentives for gathering information are stronger and for firms that rely more on external information. Our findings suggest that policies designed to “level the playing field” by publicizing internal information can have significant unintended consequences by reducing the informativeness of prices for real decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Bird & Stephen A Karolyi & Thomas G Ruchti & Phong Truong, 2021. "More is Less: Publicizing Information and Market Feedback [Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 25(3), pages 745-775.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:25:y:2021:i:3:p:745-775.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rof/rfaa028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karen‐Ann M. Dwyer & Niamh M. Brennan & Collette E. Kirwan, 2023. "Auditor Materiality in Expanded Audit Reports: More (Disclosure) is Less," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 31-45, March.
    2. Ni, Xiaoran & Wang, Ye & Yin, David, 2021. "Does Modern Information Technology Attenuate Managerial Information Hoarding? Evidence from the EDGAR Implementation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Jianghua Shen & Lingmin Xie & Zhimin Xie, 2022. "The unintended consequence of financial statement comparability: evidence from managerial learning practices," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3073-3106, September.
    4. Zhao, Jing & Huang, Jingchang & Dou, Huan, 2023. "Internet searching and investment sensitivity to stock price: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Itay Goldstein, 2023. "Information in Financial Markets and Its Real Effects," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-32.
    6. Gu, Ming & Li, Dongxu & Ni, Xiaoran, 2022. "Too much to learn? The (un)intended consequences of RegTech development on mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EDGAR; Real effects of financial markets; Price efficiency; Price informativeness; Information acquisition; SEC regulation; Information technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:25:y:2021:i:3:p:745-775.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.