IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v26y2004i1p82-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuing New Varieties: Trade-Offs between Growers and End-Users in Wheat

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce L. Dahl
  • William W. Wilson
  • D. Demcey Johnson

Abstract

Variety release decisions usually involve trade-offs between growers and end-users as well as substantial uncertainties about agronomic, quality, and economic variables. In this paper, methodologies were developed to value grower and end-user characteristics for individual wheat varieties and to evaluate trade-offs. The models capture effects of variability in agronomic, quality, and economic variables and were applied to experimental and hypothetical varieties. Results indicate two experimental varieties provide improvements in grower and end-use value over most of the incumbents. Though applied to a specific grain and region, the approach is applicable to other grains and oilseeds that have multiple agronomic and quality attributes. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce L. Dahl & William W. Wilson & D. Demcey Johnson, 2004. "Valuing New Varieties: Trade-Offs between Growers and End-Users in Wheat," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 82-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:1:p:82-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2003.00163.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wilson, William W. & Wilson, Wesley & Dahl, Bruce L., 2009. "Protein and the demand for hard wheats," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:1:p:82-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.