IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v51y1937i2p337-351..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implicit Theorizing: A Methodological Criticism of the Neo-Cambridge School

Author

Listed:
  • Wassily Leontief

Abstract

I. Distinction between logical and methodological problems, 337. — II. Methodological pattern of a deductive theory, 339. — III. Implicit vs. explicit definitions, 342. — Fundamental limitations of implicit theories, 344. — IV. Examples of implicit theorizing: Joan Robinson's "corrected units," 346. — R. F. Kahn's theory of "ideal output," 347. — J. E. Hicks' generalized concept of elasticity of substitution, 348. — J. M. Keynes' concepts of aggregate supply and demand curves, 349.

Suggested Citation

  • Wassily Leontief, 1937. "Implicit Theorizing: A Methodological Criticism of the Neo-Cambridge School," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(2), pages 337-351.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:51:y:1937:i:2:p:337-351.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882092
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Milana, 2024. "Refuting Samuelson’s capitulation on the re-switching of techniques in the Cambridge capital controversy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 179-197, June.
    2. Piero Ferri, 2011. "Macroeconomics of Growth Cycles and Financial Instability," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14260.
    3. Sordi, Serena & Vercelli, Alessandro, 2012. "Heterogeneous expectations and strong uncertainty in a Minskyian model of financial fluctuations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 544-557.
    4. Heinz D. Kurz, 2017. "Is there a “Ricardian Vice”? And what is its relationship with economic policy ad“vice”?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 91-114, January.
    5. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2014. "Mathematical Proof of the Breakdown of Capitalism," MPRA Paper 52910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Di Domenico, Lorenzo & Raberto, Marco & Safarzynska, Karolina, 2023. "Resource scarcity, circular economy and the energy rebound: A macro-evolutionary input-output model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Teodoro Dario Togati, 2021. "General Theorizing and Historical Specificity in the ‘Keynes Versus the Classics’ Dispute," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 273-294, April.
    8. Carlo Milana, 2019. "Solving the Reswitching Paradox in the Sraffian Theory of Capital," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 97-125, November.
    9. Txapartegi, Andoni & Cazcarro, Ignacio & Galarraga, Ibon, 2024. "Short-haul flights ban in France: Relevant potential but yet modest effects of GHG emissions reduction," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Akhabbar, Amanar, 2007. "Leontief et l'économie comme science empirique: la signification opérationnelle des lois [Leontief and economics as an empirical science: the “operational meaning” of laws]," MPRA Paper 30453, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:51:y:1937:i:2:p:337-351.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.