IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Less than the Gats: 'Negative Preferences' in Regional Services Agreements

  • Rudolf Adlung
  • Peter Morrison
Registered author(s):

    Regional trade agreements in services are a relatively recent, but rapidly expanding phenomenon. Their relationship with commitments undertaken under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) or offered in the Doha Round has attracted some attention in the literature. Relevant publications tend to focus on the 'value added' that such agreements might generate through broader sectoral coverage or deeper levels of liberalization. This article takes a different perspective, however, and focuses on provisions that fall short of the same countries' GATS commitments. Such 'negative preferences' are more than an isolated occurrence: they can be found in most recent agreements, including agreements involving some of the largest World Trade Organization (WTO) Members. The existence of 'negative preferences' or 'GATS-minus commitments' may prove relevant for several reasons: in particular, they could impinge on an agreement's legal status under the GATS and help create a trading system beyond the WTO. It is conceivable that such minus-commitments are mutually conceded in 'sensitive' sectors or tacitly accepted in view of 'side-payments' in non-WTO currency (including development finance). Those who subscribe to Bhagwati's comparison of PTAs with termites might thus have additional reason to be alarmed: the bugs' unconventional table manners. Oxford University Press 2010, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgq021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Journal of International Economic Law.

    Volume (Year): 13 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 4 (December)
    Pages: 1103-1143

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:13:y:2010:i:4:p:1103-1143
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
    Fax: 01865 267 985
    Web page: http://www.jiel.oupjournals.org/
    Email:

    Order Information: Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:13:y:2010:i:4:p:1103-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.