IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v43y2016i4p549-566..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contingent Nature of the Symbolic Associations of Visual Design Elements: The Case of Brand Logo Frames

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana M. Fajardo
  • Jiao Zhang
  • Michael Tsiros

Abstract

This research examines how situational factors influence the symbolic associations generated from visual design elements and their downstream consequences in terms of consumption intent. Specifically, this research focuses on a common and yet little studied brand design element: logo frames. The authors propose that a logo frame may be perceived as either protecting or confining, depending on the level of risk associated with a purchase. A high perception of risk increases the accessibility of a logo frame’s association with protection and increases purchase intent, whereas a low perception of risk increases the accessibility of a logo frame’s association with confinement and decreases purchase intent. The authors also propose that the logo frame effect may, under certain situations, extend to secondary brand identifiers (e.g., brand slogans) but will not extend to elements unrelated to brand identity (e.g., product descriptions). Six studies provide support for these propositions. The findings of this research contribute to the literature on symbolic associations by demonstrating the contingent nature of the symbolic associations triggered from a visual design element and by showing that design features can mitigate (and under certain circumstances reverse) the negative effect of increased risk perceptions on purchase intent.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana M. Fajardo & Jiao Zhang & Michael Tsiros, 2016. "The Contingent Nature of the Symbolic Associations of Visual Design Elements: The Case of Brand Logo Frames," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 549-566.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:43:y:2016:i:4:p:549-566.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucw048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wong, Jimmy & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Wang, Jessie J., 2022. "The interactive effect of power and self-construal on consumers’ preferences for brand-logo size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 279-296.
    2. Mimouni Chaabane, Aida & Pez, Virginie, 2017. "“Make me feel special†: Are hierarchical loyalty programs a panacea for all brands? The role of brand concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 108-117.
    3. V. U. Vinitha & Deepak S. Kumar & Keyoor Purani, 2021. "Biomorphic visual identity of a brand and its effects: a holistic perspective," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 272-290, May.
    4. Yu-Shan Athena Chen & Lien-Ti Bei, 2019. "Free the brand: How a logo frame influences the potentiality of brand extensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 349-364, July.
    5. Seljan, Sanja & Starešinić, Berislava & Horvat, Sara, 2021. "National Brand Identity: Pilot Study on Perception of Croatian Student Population," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2021), Hybrid Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Hybrid Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, 9-10 September 2021, pages 217-232, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    6. Bettels, Jannick & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter, 2019. "Brand logo symmetry and product design: The spillover effects on consumer inferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-9.
    7. John M. T. Balmer, 2023. "Design, corporate brand design, and corporate heritage brand design: what are they? what of them?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(2), pages 97-115, March.
    8. Chang, En-Chung & Xie, Chunya & Fan, Xiaomeng, 2022. "Defending the rules: How exposure to immoral behavior influences the boundary preference," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 654-663.
    9. Ketron, Seth & Naletelich, Kelly & Migliorati, Stefano, 2021. "Representational versus abstract imagery: Effects on purchase intentions between vice and virtue foods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 52-62.
    10. Chien-Huang Lin & Ming Chen, 2019. "The icon matters: how design instability affects download intention of mobile apps under prevention and promotion motivations," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 211-229, March.
    11. Grzegorz Godlewski & Adam Marciniak & Anna M. Zarzycka, 2023. "Logotype as a Tool in Marketing Communication: An Analysisof Websites of Agritourism Farms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    12. Gianluca Fiocchi & Mona Seyed Esfahani, 2024. "Exploring the uniqueness of distinctive brand assets within the UK automotive industry," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Courtney Szocs & Sara Williamson & Adam Mills, 2022. "Contained: why it’s better to display some products without a package," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 131-146, January.
    14. Li, Ruiqin & Wang, Yan & Zhang, Hongli, 2023. "The shape of premiumness: Logo Shape's effects on perceived brand premiumness and brand preference," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Liying Xu & Feng Yu & Xiaojun Ding, 2020. "Circular-Looking Makes Green-Buying: How Brand Logo Shapes Influence Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:43:y:2016:i:4:p:549-566.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.