IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v18y2023ip283-294..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of carbon dioxide emission reduction in an energy cycle based on biomass gasification and molten carbonate fuel cell: exergoeconomic and environmental analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Di Zhang
  • Te Ma
  • Hadi Fooladi

Abstract

A competitive advantage for the molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)-driven energy processes is their fuel versatility. On the other hand, since MCFC consumes carbon dioxide, it can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions compared with other fuel cells. Accordingly, the current paper develops and evaluates the thermodynamic, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses of a new hybrid energy process (HEP) based on a reformer MCFC stack and a biomass gasification process. A homogeneous ignition engine (HIE) and a heat recovery system are two other main units embedded in the developed HEP. In the developed cycle, MCFC and HIE produce electric energy, for which the required fuel is supplied through the obtained syngas from the biomass gasification process and the anode off-gas, respectively. The heat recovery system also leads to the establishment of the thermal balance of the energy cycle by recovering the thermal energies of the MCFC and HIE. The aim of the present work is to develop the multi-aspect evaluation of the proposed energy system toward a fruitful implementation feasibility analysis. The outcomes indicated that the rates of electrical and thermal powers obtained from the planned HEP were equal to nearly 1112 and 367 kW, respectively. Further, the calculated efficiencies for electric, gross power and total energy terms were equal to 51.5%, 55.7% and 69.9%, respectively. The developed HEP had 48% less carbon dioxide emissions compared with a petroleum-fired power plant, 15.8% less compared with a natural gas-fired plant and approximately 63% lower compared with a coal-fired power plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Zhang & Te Ma & Hadi Fooladi, 2023. "Evaluation of carbon dioxide emission reduction in an energy cycle based on biomass gasification and molten carbonate fuel cell: exergoeconomic and environmental analyses," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 18, pages 283-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:18:y:2023:i::p:283-294.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctad006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hashemian, Nasim & Noorpoor, Alireza, 2022. "A geothermal-biomass powered multi-generation plant with freshwater and hydrogen generation options: Thermo-economic-environmental appraisals and multi-criteria optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 254-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lv, Xuefei & Lv, Ying & Zhu, Yiping, 2023. "Multi-variable study and MOPSO-based multi-objective optimization of a novel cogeneration plant using biomass fuel and geothermal energy: A complementary hybrid design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    2. Zhang, Mingming & Timoshin, Anton & Al-Ammar, Essam A. & Sillanpaa, Mika & Zhang, Guiju, 2023. "Power, cooling, freshwater, and hydrogen production system from a new integrated system working with the zeotropic mixture, using a flash-binary geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:18:y:2023:i::p:283-294.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.