IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v16y2021i3p798-813..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel exergy-based assessment on a multi-production plant of power, heat and hydrogen: integration of solid oxide fuel cell, solid oxide electrolyzer cell and Rankine steam cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Milad Sadeghzadeh
  • Mehdi Mehrpooya
  • Hojat Ansarinasab

Abstract

TitleMulti-production plant is an idea highlighting cost- and energy-saving purposes. However, just integrating different sub-systems is not desired and the output and performance based on evaluation criteria must be assessed. In this study, an integrated energy conversion system composed of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) and Rankine steam cycle is proposed to develop a multi-production system of power, heat and hydrogen to alleviate energy dissipation and to preserve the environment by utilizing and extracting the most possible products from the available energy source. With this regard, natural gas and water are used to drive the SOEC and the Rankine steam cycle, respectively. The required heat and power demand of the electrolyzer are designed to be provided by the fuel cell and the Rankine cycle. The feasibility of the designed integrated system is evaluated through comprehensive exergy-based analysis. The technical performance of the system is evaluated through exergy assessment and it is obtained that the SOFC and the SOEC can achieve to the high exergy efficiency of 84.8% and 63.7%, respectively. The designed system provides 1.79 kg/h of hydrogen at 125 kPa. In addition, the effective designed variables on the performance of the designed integrated system are monitored to optimize the system’s performance in terms of technical efficiency, cost-effectivity and environmental considerations. This assessment shows that 59.4 kW of the available exergy is destructed in the combustion chamber. Besides, the techno-economic analysis and exergoenvironmental assessment demonstrate the selected compressors should be re-designed to improve the cost-effectivity and decline the negative environmental impact of the designed integrated energy conversion system. In addition, it is calculated that the SOEC has the highest total cost and also the highest negative impact on the environment compared to other designed units in the proposed integrated energy conversion system.

Suggested Citation

  • Milad Sadeghzadeh & Mehdi Mehrpooya & Hojat Ansarinasab, 2021. "A novel exergy-based assessment on a multi-production plant of power, heat and hydrogen: integration of solid oxide fuel cell, solid oxide electrolyzer cell and Rankine steam cycle," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 798-813.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:798-813.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctab008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ansarinasab, Hojat & Hajabdollahi, Hassan & Fatimah, Manal, 2021. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a novel geothermal-based multigeneration system using LNG cold energy- integration of Kalina cycle, stirling engine, desalination unit and magnetic refrigeration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ansarinasab, Hojat & Mousavi, Seyed Ali, 2021. "Life cycle assessment and exergoeconomic analysis of the multi-generation system based on fuel cell for methanol, power, and heat production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1314-1332.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:798-813.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.