IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i2p300-309..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Successful Aging Through Successful Accommodation With Assistive Devices

Author

Listed:
  • Vicki A. Freedman
  • Judith D. Kasper
  • Brenda C. Spillman

Abstract

Objectives:To provide a profile of older adults who successfully accommodate declines in capacity by using assistive devices.Method:Using the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we provide national estimates of prevalent, incident, and persistent successful accommodation of mobility and self-care activity limitations. For incident and persistent accommodation groups, we describe their subjective wellbeing and participation restrictions, health and functioning, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and acquisition of assistive devices and environmental features. We estimate regression models predicting incident and persistent successful accommodation and the extent of wellbeing and participation restrictions for incident and persistent groups (vs. those who are fully able).Results:Nearly one-quarter of older adults have put in place accommodations that allow them to carry out daily activities with no assistance or difficulty. In adjusted models, incident and persistent successful accommodation is more common for those ages 80–89, those with more children, and those living in homes with environmental features already installed; wellbeing levels for these groups are similar and participation restrictions only slightly below those who are fully able.Discussion:A focus on facilitating successful accommodation among those who experience declines in capacity may be an effective means of promoting participation and wellbeing in later life.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicki A. Freedman & Judith D. Kasper & Brenda C. Spillman, 2017. "Successful Aging Through Successful Accommodation With Assistive Devices," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 300-309.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:2:p:300-309.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freedman, V.A. & Kasper, J.D. & Spillman, B.C. & Agree, E.M. & Mor, V. & Wallace, R.B. & Wolf, D.A., 2014. "Behavioral adaptation and late-life disability: A new spectrum for assessing public health impacts," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(2), pages 88-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young Ko & Wonjung Noh, 2021. "A Scoping Review of Homebound Older People: Definition, Measurement and Determinants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Merja Rantakokko & Erja Portegijs & Anne Viljanen & Susanne Iwarsson & Taina Rantanen, 2016. "Mobility Modification Alleviates Environmental Influence on Incident Mobility Difficulty among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Montez, Jennifer Karas & Hayward, Mark D. & Wolf, Douglas A., 2017. "Do U.S. states' socioeconomic and policy contexts shape adult disability?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-126.
    4. Meghan Jenkins Morales & Stephanie A Robert & Deborah Carr, 0. "Black–White Disparities in Moves to Assisted Living and Nursing Homes Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries," Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 1972-1982.
    5. Agree Emily M. & Wolf Douglas A., 2018. "Disability Measurement in the Health and Retirement Study," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:2:p:300-309.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.