IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p3949-d533024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Scoping Review of Homebound Older People: Definition, Measurement and Determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Young Ko

    (College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea)

  • Wonjung Noh

    (College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea)

Abstract

Being homebound (HB) can affect people’s physical and mental health by decreasing movement, which can itself be exacerbated by the deterioration of people’s health. To break this vicious cycle of HB and being in poor health, it is necessary to identify and address the factors influencing HB status. Thus, we used a scoping review to identify an HB trend, focusing on the definition, measurements, and determinants of HB status. We analyzed 47 studies according to the five-stage methodological framework for scoping reviews. The common attribute of definitions of HB status was that the boundaries of daily life are limited to the home. However, this varied according to duration and causes of becoming HB; thus, the understanding of HB shifted from the presence or absence of being HB to the continuum of daily activity. Various definitions and measurements have been used to date. Many studies have focused on individual factors to analyze the effect of HB. In the future, it will be necessary to develop a standardized measurement that reflects the multidimensional HB state. In addition, it is necessary to utilize a theoretical framework to explore the social and environmental factors affecting HB.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Ko & Wonjung Noh, 2021. "A Scoping Review of Homebound Older People: Definition, Measurement and Determinants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3949-:d:533024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freedman, V.A. & Kasper, J.D. & Spillman, B.C. & Agree, E.M. & Mor, V. & Wallace, R.B. & Wolf, D.A., 2014. "Behavioral adaptation and late-life disability: A new spectrum for assessing public health impacts," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(2), pages 88-94.
    2. Xiaoling Xiang & Ruopeng An & Hyunsung Oh & Deborah Carr, 2020. "The Bidirectional Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Homebound Status Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(2), pages 357-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merja Rantakokko & Erja Portegijs & Anne Viljanen & Susanne Iwarsson & Taina Rantanen, 2016. "Mobility Modification Alleviates Environmental Influence on Incident Mobility Difficulty among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Vicki A. Freedman & Judith D. Kasper & Brenda C. Spillman, 2017. "Successful Aging Through Successful Accommodation With Assistive Devices," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 300-309.
    3. Montez, Jennifer Karas & Hayward, Mark D. & Wolf, Douglas A., 2017. "Do U.S. states' socioeconomic and policy contexts shape adult disability?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 115-126.
    4. Meghan Jenkins Morales & Stephanie A Robert & Deborah Carr, 0. "Black–White Disparities in Moves to Assisted Living and Nursing Homes Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries," Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 1972-1982.
    5. Agree Emily M. & Wolf Douglas A., 2018. "Disability Measurement in the Health and Retirement Study," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:3949-:d:533024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.