IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v40y2013i4p659-683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural expenditure in the European Union budget: a graphical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio De Filippis
  • Roberto Henke
  • Luca Salvatici
  • Roberta Sardone

Abstract

The review of the European Union (EU) budget and the Common Agricultural Policy reform are tightly connected issues influencing each other. We assume that the outcomes will be influenced by their impact on the net balances of Member States (MSs), and use isobudget and isobalance functions to analyse different hypotheses about the EU budget expenditure. These functions are key in understanding substitutability or complementarity between agricultural and other expenditures and shed some light on the positions of the MSs in favour or against possible reform proposals. , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio De Filippis & Roberto Henke & Luca Salvatici & Roberta Sardone, 2013. "Agricultural expenditure in the European Union budget: a graphical analysis," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(4), pages 659-683, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:40:y:2013:i:4:p:659-683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbt004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2015. "In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 681-704, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:40:y:2013:i:4:p:659-683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.