IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v132y2022i643p1218-1232..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Performance in Remote Work: Evidence from Professional Chess

Author

Listed:
  • Steffen Künn
  • Christian Seel
  • Dainis Zegners

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional (offline) chess tournaments were prohibited and instead held online. We exploit this unique setting to assess the impact of remote work policies on the cognitive performance of individuals. Using the artificial intelligence embodied in a powerful chess engine to assess the quality of chess moves and associated errors, we find a statistically and economically significant decrease in performance when an individual competes remotely versus offline in a face-to-face setting. The effect size decreases over time, suggesting an adaptation to the new remote setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffen Künn & Christian Seel & Dainis Zegners, 2022. "Cognitive Performance in Remote Work: Evidence from Professional Chess," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(643), pages 1218-1232.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:132:y:2022:i:643:p:1218-1232.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueab094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Kai & Reade, J. James & Schmal, W. Benedikt, 2022. "What cannot be cured must be endured: The long-lasting effect of a COVID-19 infection on workplace productivity," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Fenizia, Alessandra & Kirchmaier, Thomas, 2024. "Not incentivized yet efficient: working from home in the public sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126773, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Guillaume M. A. Morlet & Thomas Bolli, 2024. "Working from home is here to stay, but how does it affect workplace learning?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 160(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Mehmet S. Ismail, 2023. "Human and Machine Intelligence in n-Person Games with Partial Knowledge: Theory and Computation," Papers 2302.13937, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    5. Naidenova, Iuliia & Parshakov, Petr & Tylkin, Igor & Vasiliev, Gleb, 2024. "Choking under pressure in online and live esports competitions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Johannes Carow & Niklas M. Witzig, 2024. "Time Pressure and Strategic Risk-Taking in Professional Chess," Working Papers 2404, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    7. Enzo Brox & Michael Lechner, 2024. "Teamwork and Spillover Effects in Performance Evaluations," Papers 2403.15200, arXiv.org.
    8. Lee, Kangoh, 2023. "Working from home as an economic and social change: A review," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Piotr Lewandowski & Katarzyna Lipowska & Mateusz Smoter, 2022. "Mismatch in preferences for working from home – evidence from discrete choice experiments with workers and employers," IBS Working Papers 05/2022, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:132:y:2022:i:643:p:1218-1232.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.