IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v11y2018i3p503-517..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making sense of remunicipalisation: theoretical reflections on and political possibilities from Germany’s Rekommumalisierung process

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Cumbers
  • Sören Becker

Abstract

The increasingly discussed phenomenon of ‘remunicipalisation’ marks a global trend since 2000 for cities to take formerly privatised assets, infrastructure and services back into public ownership. It is most prominent in basic service sectors such as water and energy, but it is also evident in a range of diverse utility and infrastructure areas—from education, health, refuse and other areas of local government. As a reaction to the problems and contradictions arising from four decades of privatisation and marketisation of public services, remunicipalisation represents a compelling contemporary phenomenon of urban politics and governance. In this article, we critically interrogate remunicipalisation in the face of ongoing and mutating processes of neoliberal urbanism. Drawing upon evidence from the German Rekommunalisierung process in the energy sector, we explore both the wider conceptual significance of remunicipalisation and its progressive potential in contributing to an alternative urban politics beyond neoliberalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Cumbers & Sören Becker, 2018. "Making sense of remunicipalisation: theoretical reflections on and political possibilities from Germany’s Rekommumalisierung process," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 503-517.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:503-517.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsy025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Wagner & Kurt Berlo & Christian Herr & Michael Companie, 2021. "Success Factors for the Foundation of Municipal Utilities in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Wainer, A. & Petrovics, D. & van der Grijp, N., 2022. "The grid access of energy communities a comparison of power grid governance in France and Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Public interest and early termination of PPP contracts. Can fair and reasonable compensations be determined?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. McGovern, Gerard, 2021. "Capturing community value in civic energy business model design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Stephen Leitheiser & Alexander Follmann, 2020. "The social innovation–(re)politicisation nexus: Unlocking the political in actually existing smart city campaigns? The case of SmartCity Cologne, Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 894-915, March.
    6. Ron Martin & Flavia Martinelli & Judith Clifton, 2022. "Rethinking spatial policy in an era of multiple crises [An institutional perspective on regional economic development]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(1), pages 3-21.
    7. Leon Wansleben & Nils Neumann, 2024. "Entrepreneurs beyond neoliberalism: Municipally owned corporations and climate change mitigation in German cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(5), pages 799-820, April.
    8. Søren Djørup & Karl Sperling & Steffen Nielsen & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Jakob Zinck Thellufsen & Peter Sorknæs & Henrik Lund & David Drysdale, 2020. "District Heating Tariffs, Economic Optimisation and Local Strategies during Radical Technological Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:503-517.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.