IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i6p1402-1408..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual attributes and self-organizational processes affect dominance network structure in pukeko

Author

Listed:
  • Cody J. Dey
  • James S. Quinn

Abstract

Dominance relationships are an important type of social relationship that can influence group dynamics and individual fitness. However, most studies on dominance have been restricted to investigating the orderliness of dominance hierarchies and how individual traits influence dominance rank. Here, we used a social network approach to investigate the patterns and quality of dominance interactions in the pukeko, a cooperatively breeding bird that lives in stable, mixed-sex social groups. By using a combination of modern statistical techniques, including one of the first applications of exponential random graph models in behavioral ecology, we show that pukeko dominance networks emerge from both the attributes of individuals, as well as from endogenous, self-organization of dominance relationships (i.e., structural dependence). Pukeko dominance networks were influenced by sexual differences in dominance interactions, sexual homophily, characteristics of status signals, and a tendency to form transitive triad motifs. These factors have differential effects on submissive and aggressive behaviors but ultimately lead to the formation of orderly and highly asymmetrical dominance hierarchies that are temporally stable. This study demonstrates the utility of multivariate statistical tools for network analysis of animal societies and provides a rich understanding of the factors that influence dominance interactions in this interesting species.

Suggested Citation

  • Cody J. Dey & James S. Quinn, 2014. "Individual attributes and self-organizational processes affect dominance network structure in pukeko," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1402-1408.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:6:p:1402-1408.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru138
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David B. McDonald & Daizaburo Shizuka, 2013. "Comparative transitive and temporal orderliness in dominance networks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 511-520.
    2. Lee Alan Dugatkin & Ryan L. Earley, 2003. "Group fusion: the impact of winner, loser, and bystander effects on hierarchy formation in large groups," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 367-373, May.
    3. Hunter, David R. & Handcock, Mark S. & Butts, Carter T. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Morris, Martina, 2008. "ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i03).
    4. Handcock, Mark S. & Hunter, David R. & Butts, Carter T. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Morris, Martina, 2008. "statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i01).
    5. Stanley Wasserman & Philippa Pattison, 1996. "Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 401-425, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Anna Favati & Hanne Løvlie & Olof Leimar, 2017. "Individual aggression, but not winner–loser effects, predicts social rank in male domestic fowl," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(3), pages 874-882.
    3. Changwei Yuan & Jinrui Zhu & Shuai Zhang & Jiannan Zhao & Shibo Zhu, 2024. "Analysis of the Spatial Correlation Network and Driving Mechanism of China’s Transportation Carbon Emission Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Gong, Yuanyuan & Sun, Hui & Wang, Zhiwei & Ding, Chenxin, 2023. "Spatial correlation network pattern and evolution mechanism of natural gas consumption in China—Complex network-based ERGM model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Nicola, Giacomo & Fritz, Cornelius & Mehrl, Marius & Kauermann, Göran, 2023. "Dependence matters: Statistical models to identify the drivers of tie formation in economic networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 351-363.
    2. Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S. & Hunter, David R. & Butts, Carter T. & Morris, Martina, 2008. "A statnet Tutorial," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i09).
    3. Angel Ortiz-Pelaez & Getaneh Ashenafi & Francois Roger & Agnes Waret-Szkuta, 2012. "Can Geographical Factors Determine the Choices of Farmers in the Ethiopian Highlands to Trade in Livestock Markets?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Samrachana Adhikari & Beau Dabbs, 2018. "Social Network Analysis in R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 225-253, April.
    5. Krivitsky, Pavel N., 2017. "Using contrastive divergence to seed Monte Carlo MLE for exponential-family random graph models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 149-161.
    6. Duxbury, Scott W, 2019. "Mediation and Moderation in Statistical Network Models," SocArXiv 9bs4u, Center for Open Science.
    7. Nolan E. Phillips & Brian L. Levy & Robert J. Sampson & Mario L. Small & Ryan Q. Wang, 2021. "The Social Integration of American Cities: Network Measures of Connectedness Based on Everyday Mobility Across Neighborhoods," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(3), pages 1110-1149, August.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:24:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lee, Jihui & Li, Gen & Wilson, James D., 2020. "Varying-coefficient models for dynamic networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Pavel N. Krivitsky & Laura M. Koehly & Christopher Steven Marcum, 2020. "Exponential-Family Random Graph Models for Multi-Layer Networks," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 630-659, September.
    11. Javier Sánchez García & Salvador Cruz Rambaud, 2024. "The network econometrics of financial concentration," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 2007-2045, July.
    12. Yaveroğlu, Ömer Nebil & Fitzhugh, Sean M. & Kurant, Maciej & Markopoulou, Athina & Butts, Carter T. & Pržulj, Nataša, 2015. "ergm.graphlets: A Package for ERG Modeling Based on Graphlet Statistics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i12).
    13. Jeffrey A. Smith & Jessica Burow, 2020. "Using Ego Network Data to Inform Agent-based Models of Diffusion," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(4), pages 1018-1063, November.
    14. Sebastian Spaeth & Sven Niederhöfer, 2022. "Compatibility promotion between platforms: The role of open technology standards and giant platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1891-1915, December.
    15. Kei, Yik Lun & Chen, Yanzhen & Madrid Padilla, Oscar Hernan, 2023. "A partially separable model for dynamic valued networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Ivan Cucco, 2014. "Network-based policies and innovation networks in two Italian regions: a comparison through a social selection model," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(114), pages 78-96.
    17. Bruce A Desmarais & Skyler J Cranmer, 2012. "Statistical Inference for Valued-Edge Networks: The Generalized Exponential Random Graph Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    18. Joshua Daniel Loyal & Yuguo Chen, 2020. "Statistical Network Analysis: A Review with Applications to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 419-440, August.
    19. Johannes Pol, 2019. "Introduction to Network Modeling Using Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM): Theory and an Application Using R-Project," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 845-875, October.
    20. Vishesh Karwa & Pavel N. Krivitsky & Aleksandra B. Slavković, 2017. "Sharing social network data: differentially private estimation of exponential family random-graph models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 481-500, April.
    21. Taedong Lee & Susan Meene, 2012. "Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(3), pages 199-220, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:6:p:1402-1408.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.