IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v101y2019i3p870-893..html

Technology Spillovers and Land Use Change: Empirical Evidence from Global Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson B Villoria

Abstract

We estimate the effects of agricultural technological progress on cropland expansion at various geographical resolutions, from the country level to the world as a whole, while formally accounting for the international interdependence of national supply responses. Evidence for these effects has thus far been scant, contributing to polarized perceptions about the potential for improving agricultural technologies as a means to slow down deforestation. We find that, in most countries of the world, growth in total factor productivity (TFP) is either uncorrelated or is positively associated with cropland expansion. Yet worldwide TFP growth have been an important source of global land savings. The divergence between the country-level and the global results is explained by the changes in production patterns as countries interact in international markets. Our preferred point estimate of the elasticity of global cropland to global TFP growth is -0.34. Moreover, we estimate that satisfying food demand from 1991 to 2010 without observed TFP growth would have necessitated an additional 173 million hectares, or close to 10% of the area covered by tropical rain forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson B Villoria, 2019. "Technology Spillovers and Land Use Change: Empirical Evidence from Global Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(3), pages 870-893.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:3:p:870-893.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aay088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zanetti de Lima, Cicero & Martha, Geraldo & Barioni, Luis G. & Baldos, Uris Lantz & Hertel, Thomas, 2022. "Agricultural R&D investments in Brazil: global responses and local spillovers," Conference papers 333395, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Kubitza, Christoph & Dib, Jonida Bou & Kopp, Thomas & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Nuryartono, Nunung & Qaim, Matin & Romero, Miriam & Klasen, Stephan, 2019. "Labor savings in agriculture and inequality at different spatial scales: The expansion of oil palm in Indonesia," EFForTS Discussion Paper Series 26, University of Goettingen, Collaborative Research Centre 990 "EFForTS, Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)".
    3. Christoph Kubitza & Vijesh V. Krishna & Stephan Klasen & Thomas Kopp & Nunung Nuryartono & Matin Qaim, 2024. "Labor Displacement in Agriculture: Evidence from Oil Palm Expansion in Indonesia," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 100(3), pages 547-567.
    4. Edoardo Baldoni & Roberto Esposti, 2021. "Agricultural Productivity in Space: an Econometric Assessment Based on Farm‐Level Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1525-1544, August.
    5. Keith O. Fuglie & Thomas W. Hertel & David B. Lobell & Nelson B. Villoria, 2024. "Agricultural Productivity and Climate Mitigation," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 21-40, October.
    6. Bernhard Dalheimer & Christoph Kubitza & Bernhard Brümmer, 2022. "Technical efficiency and farmland expansion: Evidence from oil palm smallholders in Indonesia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1364-1387, August.
    7. repec:ags:aaea22:335902 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Muhammad Usman & Gulnaz Hameed & Abdul Saboor & Lal K. Almas & Muhammad Hanif, 2021. "R&D Innovation Adoption, Climatic Sensitivity, and Absorptive Ability Contribution for Agriculture TFP Growth in Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Keith Fuglie & Srabashi Ray & Uris Lantz C. Baldos & Thomas W. Hertel, 2022. "The R&D cost of climate mitigation in agriculture," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1955-1974, December.
    10. Kubitza, Christoph & Vijesh, Krishna V. & Klasen, Stephan & Kopp, Thomas & Nuryartono, Nunung & Qaim, Matin, 2021. "Labor Displacement in Agriculture: The Case of Oil Palm in Indonesia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314982, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Paul Brenton & Vicky Chemutai & Mari Pangestu, 2022. "Trade and food security in a climate change‐impacted world," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 580-591, July.
    12. Cisneros-Pineda, Alfredo & Hertel, Thomas W. & Baldos, Uris Lantz C. & Chaudhary, Abhishek, 2023. "Can Productivity Growth Contribute to Biodiversity Preservation? The Role of International Trade," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335902, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Wen, Lanjiao & Chatalova, Lioudmila, 2021. "Will transaction costs and economies of scale tip the balance in farm size in industrial agriculture? An illustration for non-food biomass production in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2).
    14. Matin Qaim, 2020. "Role of New Plant Breeding Technologies for Food Security and Sustainable Agricultural Development," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 129-150, June.
    15. Lanjiao Wen & Lioudmila Chatalova, 2021. "Will Transaction Costs and Economies of Scale Tip the Balance in Farm Size in Industrial Agriculture? An Illustration for Non-Food Biomass Production in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Lingran Yuan & Shurui Zhang & Shuo Wang & Zesen Qian & Binlei Gong, 2021. "World agricultural convergence," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 135-153, April.
    17. Nicolae Istudor & Marius Constantin & Donatella Privitera & Raluca Ignat & Irina-Elena Petrescu & Cristian Teodor, 2025. "Systemic Competitiveness in the EU Cereal Value Chain: A Network Perspective for Policy Alignment," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:3:p:870-893.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.