IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/bulimm/v23y2023p469-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods And Techniques To Involve Freight Actors In The R&D Process Towards Digitalised Intermodal Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Norina Szander

    (KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Limited Liability Company, Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ola Qasseer

    (KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Limited Liability Company and ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary)

  • Peter Bajor

    (KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Limited Liability Company and Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Providing efficient, resilient, and sustainable freight networks requires active participation of freight actors in the transition process towards synchro-modal, multi-level distribution, and zero-carbon emission transportation systems. The vision of the Physical Internet (PI) describes the future of logistics like the operation of the internet today, where flow occurs physically based on network resources, neglecting any pre-defined routes or nodes. Active collaboration of freight actors in such an environment is inevitable to be able to manage transport and distribution activities by a governing body. To be competitive in a PI-based logistics market, freight actors need to modify their behavior. They should change the current approach of competing for customers or exclusive partnerships and focus on “operational excellence”. In our paper, we are presenting the main drivers of such a transition towards the PI. We aim to analyze and synthesize the results of some selected scientific and R&D activities related to the evolution of freight systems towards the PI. We apply the TRIZ methodology (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) and explore the connections between the STRIA and ALICE Roadmaps. Although information technologies are present in the form of digital twins, artificial intelligence, and many other forms, trust in the technology and in the PI as an ultimate ideal solution has not been built up yet. There is a fear and a lack of willingness by actors to share their data voluntarily in the freight data communities. Based on the experience of various R&D projects, analysts concluded that proper organizational and governmental factors of freight data communities are essential for survival. Understanding the nature of these common pool resource (CPR) management systems and identifying the factors needed to overcome the freight actor point of view is crucial. Proper freight systems can be planned by forming possible strategies for the inevitable transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Norina Szander & Ola Qasseer & Peter Bajor, 2023. "Methods And Techniques To Involve Freight Actors In The R&D Process Towards Digitalised Intermodal Cooperation," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 23, pages 469-479.
  • Handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:23:y:2023:p:469-479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement23/blimm2326.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ondrej Stopka & Vladislav Zitrický & Vladimír Ľupták & Mária Stopková, 2023. "Application of specific tools of the Theory of Constraints – a case study," Cognitive Sustainability, Cognitive Sustainability Ltd., vol. 2(1), pages 18-29, March.
    2. Elinor Ostrom, 2000. "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 137-158, Summer.
    3. Adrienn Boldizsar & Ferenc Meszaros & Erika Torok, 2022. "Social and Economic Analysis of the EU Road Freight Transport Fleet," Cognitive Sustainability, Cognitive Sustainability Ltd., vol. 1(2), pages 3-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karla Hoff & Mayuresh Kshetramade & Ernst Fehr, 2011. "Caste and Punishment: the Legacy of Caste Culture in Norm Enforcement," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(556), pages 449-475, November.
    2. Aurora García‐Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzís, 2009. "Market Effects of Changes in Consumers' Social Responsibility," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 235-262, March.
    3. Dritan Osmani & Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "Evolution in time of Farsightedly Stable Coalitions: An Application of FUND," Working Papers FNU-162, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised May 2008.
    4. Kerri Brick & Martine Visser & Justine Burns, 2012. "Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 133-152.
    5. Evans, Alecia & Sesmero, Juan, 2022. "Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Correlated Noisy Payoffs: Theory and Experimental Evidence," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 322804, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Gonzalo Olcina & Vicente Calabuig, 2015. "Coordinated Punishment and the Evolution of Cooperation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 17(2), pages 147-173, April.
    7. Erin L. Krupka & Roberto A. Weber, 2013. "Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 495-524, June.
    8. Anne-Sarah Chiambretto & Hubert Stahn, 2017. "Voluntary Management of Fisheries under an Uncertain Background Legislative Threat," Working Papers halshs-01500543, HAL.
    9. Pilar Useche, 2016. "Who Contributes to the Provision of Public Goods at the Community Level? The Case of Potable Water in Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(6), pages 869-888, November.
    10. Patrick Bottazzi & David Crespo & Harry Soria & Hy Dao & Marcelo Serrudo & Jean Paul Benavides & Stefan Schwarzer & Stephan Rist, 2014. "Carbon Sequestration in Community Forests: Trade-offs, Multiple Outcomes and Institutional Diversity in the Bolivian Amazon," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(1), pages 105-131, January.
    11. Ethan Holdahl & Jiabin Wu, 2023. "Institutional Screening and the Sustainability of Conditional Cooperation," Papers 2311.02813, arXiv.org.
    12. Catherine C Eckel & Enrique Fatas & Sara Godoy & Rick K Wilson, 2016. "Group-Level Selection Increases Cooperation in the Public Goods Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Friedman, Rachel S. & Guerrero, Angela M. & McAllister, Ryan R.J. & Rhodes, Jonathan R. & Santika, Truly & Budiharta, Sugeng & Indrawan, Tito & Hutabarat, Joseph A. & Kusworo, Ahmad & Yogaswara, Herry, 2020. "Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Katherine Casey & Rachel Glennerster & Edward Miguel & Maarten Voors, 2023. "Skill Versus Voice in Local Development," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 311-326, March.
    15. Bruno S. Frey & Alois Stutzer, 2006. "Environmental Morale and Motivation," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-17, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    16. Kieran Donaghy, 2011. "Models of travel demand with endogenous preference change and heterogeneous agents," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 17-30, March.
    17. Inmaculada Buendía-Martínez & Inmaculada Carrasco Monteagudo, 2020. "The Role of CSR on Social Entrepreneurship: An International Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Maccarrone, Giovanni & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, 2023. "Shop Until You Drop: the Unexpected Effects of Anticonsumerism and Environmentalism," FEEM Working Papers 330384, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    19. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2009. "Alternating Currents or Counter-Revolution? Contemporary Electricity Reform in New Zealand, VUW Press 2005 , 1-346," Working Paper Series 4321, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    20. Ugo Merlone & Daren Sandbank & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2013. "Equilibria analysis in social dilemma games with Skinnerian agents," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 12(2), pages 219-233, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:23:y:2023:p:469-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.