IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbfi/y2019iq2-19b1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonperforming loans in CESEE – a brief update on their definitions and recent developments

Author

Abstract

This study is a brief update of a previous contribution (2013) on national definitions of nonperforming loans (NPLs) in ten relatively large economies in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE), i.e. Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia and Ukraine. Against the background of the recent emergence (2013/2015) of internationally harmonized standards of the European Banking Authority (EBA), the present study explores how these national definitions have evolved in the past five years (2013–2018) and whether there has been a tendency toward definitional convergence. We find that some convergence toward EBA/international NPL standards has definitely taken place in recent years. All CESEE EU Member States covered in this study have adopted or confirmed their use of the EBA NPL definition (“90 days+” and/or “unlikeliness to pay”) or of a corresponding stipulation. Serbia and Ukraine have also further approached internationally accepted standards, while Russia’s definition seems to remain somewhat less strict. In any case, none of the countries observed have moved away from international standards. That said, more specific issues related to e.g. the treatment of restructured loans and collateral apparently still give rise to some differences. All observed countries – apart from Russia and Ukraine – boast declining NPL ratios in 2013–2018.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Barisitz, 2019. "Nonperforming loans in CESEE – a brief update on their definitions and recent developments," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q2/19, pages 61-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfi:y:2019:i:q2/19:b:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:fb592915-8f09-426b-90d5-ef2cc28122dd/04_feei_2019_q2_nonperforming-loans-in-CESEE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bholat, David & Lastra, Rosa & Markose, Sheri & Miglionico, Andrea & Sen, Kallol, 2016. "Non-performing loans: regulatory and accounting treatments of assets," Bank of England working papers 594, Bank of England.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephan Barisitz & Philippe Deswel, 2021. "European banks in Russia: developments and perspectives from 2017 through the COVID-19 pandemic (2020/2021)," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/21, pages 59-75.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andries, Kathleen & Gallemore, John & Jacob, Martin, 2017. "The effect of corporate taxation on bank transparency: Evidence from loan loss provisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 307-328.
    2. Nicolò Fraccaroli, 2019. "Supervisory Governance, Capture and Non-Performing Loans," CEIS Research Paper 471, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 08 Oct 2019.
    3. Brunella Bruno & Immacolata Marino, 2018. "How Do Banks Respond to Non-Performing Loans?," CSEF Working Papers 513, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy, revised 30 Jul 2021.
    4. Emil Ślązak & Magdalena Skwarzec, 2022. "The effects of IFRS 9 valuation model on cost of risk in commercial banks – the impact of COVID-19," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(1), pages 47-78.
    5. Várkonyi, Patrik & Szücs, Tamás & Cziglerné, Erb Edina & Pasitka, Ármin, 2024. "A pénzügyi instrumentumok új számviteli standardja a Covid árnyékában [European banks implementation of IFRS 9 in the shadow of the pandemic]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 201-222.
    6. Attila Háda, 2019. "Banking Supervisors Tracing the Transition to IFRS 9," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 18(4), pages 77-111.
    7. Mike Anson & David Bholat & Miao Kang & Ryland Thomas, 2017. "The Bank of England as Lender of Last Resort: New historical evidence from daily transactional data," Working Papers 0117, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    8. Brunella Bruno & Immacolata Marino, 2017. "Bad loans and resource allocation in crisis years: Evidence from European banks," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1752, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    9. Bholat, David & Darbyshire, Robin, 2016. "Accounting in central banks," Bank of England working papers 604, Bank of England.
    10. Andreas Jobst & Miss Anke Weber, 2016. "Profitability and Balance Sheet Repair of Italian Banks," IMF Working Papers 2016/175, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Vasilis Siakoulis, 2017. "Fiscal policy effects on non-performing loan formation," Working Papers 224, Bank of Greece.
    12. Momtaj Parvin & Merajul Islam & Larysa Vdovenko, 2023. "Impact of Non-Performing Loans on the Growth of the Banking Sector in Bangladesh," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 79-90, March.
    13. Bian, Wenlong & Ji, Yang & Wang, Peng, 2021. "Political connections and banks' credit smoothing behavior: Incentives and costs," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Alessi, Lucia & Bruno, Brunella & Carletti, Elena & Neugebauer, Katja, 2019. "What drives bank coverage ratios: Evidence from the euro area," Working Papers 2019-14, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bank lending; CESEE; credit quality; credit risk; financial soundness indicators; nonperforming loans; NPL standards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfi:y:2019:i:q2/19:b:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabeth Beckmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.