IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v2y2019i5d10.1038_s41893-019-0271-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City energysheds and renewable energy in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher R. DeRolph

    (Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Ryan A. McManamay

    (Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • April M. Morton

    (National Security Emerging Technologies Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Sujithkumar Surendran Nair

    (Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Abstract

Cities are powerful political and economic entities, and for many cities cultivating renewable energy penetration is sound economic policy. Many power plants in the United States will need to be replaced in the coming decades, so opportunities for renewable energy development are imminent. Although numerous cities have committed to sourcing 100% of their electricity needs from renewables, those cities represent a very small portion of cities across the United States. Due to their high energy consumption, cities have environmental impacts in areas far from their centre but are often unaware of these impacts and are thus unmotivated to undergo a transition to more sustainable energy sources. Herein we present a spatial framework for matching the supply of energy to demand across the electricity grid that allows for allocation of city energysheds. A city energyshed comprises the network of power plants that supply a given city and the amount of energy drawn from each plant. The power plant–city links revealed by energysheds allow for estimations of a city’s energy mix and environmental footprint from electricity consumption, and provide urban areas with insights into their energy sources that can catalyse renewable energy penetration for cities seeking to expand their renewable portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher R. DeRolph & Ryan A. McManamay & April M. Morton & Sujithkumar Surendran Nair, 2019. "City energysheds and renewable energy in the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(5), pages 412-420, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0271-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0271-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0271-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-019-0271-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamila Svobodova & John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp & Vítězslav Moudrý & Éléonore Lèbre & Martin Stringer & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2022. "Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Yang, Chunmeng & Bu, Siqi & Fan, Yi & Wan, Wayne Xinwei & Wang, Ruoheng & Foley, Aoife, 2023. "Data-driven prediction and evaluation on future impact of energy transition policies in smart regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    3. Wang, Jianxiao & An, Qi & Zhao, Yue & Pan, Guangsheng & Song, Jie & Hu, Qinran & Tan, Chin-Woo, 2023. "Role of electrolytic hydrogen in smart city decarbonization in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. Tu, Chuang & Mu, Xianzhong & Chen, Jian & Kong, Li & Zhang, Zheng & Lu, Yutong & Hu, Guangwen, 2021. "Study on the interactive relationship between urban residents’ expenditure and energy consumption of production sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:2:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0271-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.