IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-19741-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Peckham

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL)

  • Nina M. Gruijter

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL)

  • Charles Raine

    (Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL)

  • Anna Radziszewska

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL)

  • Coziana Ciurtin

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL)

  • Lucy R. Wedderburn

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital)

  • Elizabeth C. Rosser

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    Centre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL)

  • Kate Webb

    (University of Cape Town
    Crick African Network)

  • Claire T. Deakin

    (Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH
    UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital)

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, exhibits differences in morbidity and mortality between sexes. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.47) compared to females. With few exceptions, the sex bias observed in COVID-19 is a worldwide phenomenon. An appreciation of how sex is influencing COVID-19 outcomes will have important implications for clinical management and mitigation strategies for this disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Peckham & Nina M. Gruijter & Charles Raine & Anna Radziszewska & Coziana Ciurtin & Lucy R. Wedderburn & Elizabeth C. Rosser & Kate Webb & Claire T. Deakin, 2020. "Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19741-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19741-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danielsen, Ann Caroline & Lee, Katharine MN & Boulicault, Marion & Rushovich, Tamara & Gompers, Annika & Tarrant, Amelia & Reiches, Meredith & Shattuck-Heidorn, Heather & Miratrix, Luke W. & Richardso, 2022. "Sex disparities in COVID-19 outcomes in the United States: Quantifying and contextualizing variation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    2. Kabir,Kayenat & Dudu,Hasan & Tchana Tchana,Fulbert, 2021. "Gender Dimensions of COVID-19 Economic Impact in Chad : Insights from a CGE Model and Household Phone Survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9679, The World Bank.
    3. Simone Ghislandi & Raya Muttarak & Markus Sauerberg & Benedetta Scotti, 2022. "Human costs of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the major epicentres in Italy," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 20(1), pages 285-282.
    4. Egor Malkov, 2021. "Spousal Occupational Sorting and COVID-19 Incidence: Evidence from the United States," Papers 2107.14350, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    5. Nathália Mariana Santos Sansone & Letícia Rogini Pereira & Matheus Negri Boschiero & Felipe Eduardo Valencise & Andréa Melo Alexandre Fraga & Fernando Augusto Lima Marson, 2022. "Characterization of Clinical Features of Hospitalized Patients Due to the SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Absence of Comorbidities Regarding the Sex: An Epidemiological Study of the First Year of the Pand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Luigi Montano & Francesco Donato & Pietro Massimiliano Bianco & Gennaro Lettieri & Antonino Guglielmino & Oriana Motta & Ian Marc Bonapace & Marina Piscopo, 2021. "Air Pollution and COVID-19: A Possible Dangerous Synergy for Male Fertility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Badr K. Aldhmadi & Rakesh Kumar & Ramaiah Itumalla & Bilesha Perera, 2021. "Depressive Symptomatology and Practice of Safety Measures among Undergraduate Students during COVID-19: Impact of Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-9, May.
    8. Maria Grazia Cagetti & Araxi Balian & Nicole Camoni & Guglielmo Campus, 2021. "Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Dental Emergency Admissions in an Urgent Dental Care Service in North Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Nicolás Bronfman & Paula Repetto & Paola Cordón & Javiera Castañeda & Pamela Cisternas, 2021. "Gender Differences on Psychosocial Factors Affecting COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19741-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.