IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v8y2018i7d10.1038_s41558-018-0207-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partitioning global land evapotranspiration using CMIP5 models constrained by observations

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Lian

    (Peking University)

  • Shilong Piao

    (Peking University
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Chris Huntingford

    (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology)

  • Yue Li

    (Peking University)

  • Zhenzhong Zeng

    (Peking University)

  • Xuhui Wang

    (Peking University)

  • Philippe Ciais

    (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), CEA CNRS UVSQ)

  • Tim R. McVicar

    (CSIRO Land and Water
    Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science)

  • Shushi Peng

    (Peking University)

  • Catherine Ottlé

    (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), CEA CNRS UVSQ)

  • Hui Yang

    (Peking University)

  • Yuting Yang

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Yongqiang Zhang

    (CSIRO Land and Water)

  • Tao Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The ratio of plant transpiration to total terrestrial evapotranspiration (T/ET) captures the role of vegetation in surface–atmosphere interactions. However, its magnitude remains highly uncertain at the global scale. Here we apply an emergent constraint approach that integrates CMIP5 Earth system models (ESMs) with 33 field T/ET measurements to re-estimate the global T/ET value. Our observational constraint strongly increases the original ESM estimates (0.41 ± 0.11) and greatly alleviates intermodel discrepancy, which leads to a new global T/ET estimate of 0.62 ± 0.06. For all the ESMs, the leaf area index is identified as the primary driver of spatial variations of T/ET, but to correct its bias generates a larger T/ET underestimation than the original ESM output. We present evidence that the ESM underestimation of T/ET is, instead, attributable to inaccurate representation of canopy light use, interception loss and root water uptake processes in the ESMs. These processes should be prioritized to reduce model uncertainties in the global hydrological cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Lian & Shilong Piao & Chris Huntingford & Yue Li & Zhenzhong Zeng & Xuhui Wang & Philippe Ciais & Tim R. McVicar & Shushi Peng & Catherine Ottlé & Hui Yang & Yuting Yang & Yongqiang Zhang & Tao Wan, 2018. "Partitioning global land evapotranspiration using CMIP5 models constrained by observations," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 640-646, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:8:y:2018:i:7:d:10.1038_s41558-018-0207-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0207-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0207-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-018-0207-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Yu & Jiafu Mao & Stan D. Wullschleger & Anping Chen & Xiaoying Shi & Yaoping Wang & Forrest M. Hoffman & Yulong Zhang & Eric Pierce, 2022. "Machine learning–based observation-constrained projections reveal elevated global socioeconomic risks from wildfire," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Zhao, Haigen & Ma, Yanfei, 2021. "Effects of various driving factors on potential evapotranspiration trends over the main grain-production area of China while accounting for vegetation dynamics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Yu, Haichao & Li, Sien & Ding, Jie & Yang, Tianyi & Wang, Yuexin, 2023. "Water use efficiency and its drivers of two typical cash crops in an arid area of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    4. Wu, Genan & Lu, Xinchen & Zhao, Wei & Cao, Ruochen & Xie, Wenqi & Wang, Liyun & Wang, Qiuhong & Song, Jiexuan & Gao, Shaobo & Li, Shenggong & Hu, Zhongmin, 2023. "The increasing contribution of greening to the terrestrial evapotranspiration in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    5. Cui, Ningbo & He, Ziling & Jiang, Shouzheng & Wang, Mingjun & Yu, Xiuyun & Zhao, Lu & Qiu, Rangjian & Gong, Daozhi & Wang, Yaosheng & Feng, Yu, 2023. "Inter-comparison of the Penman-Monteith type model in modeling the evapotranspiration and its components in an orchard plantation of Southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    6. Amin, M.G. Mostofa & Mahbub, S.M. Mubtasim & Hasan, Md. Moudud & Pervin, Wafa & Sharmin, Jinat & Hossain, Md. Delwar, 2023. "Plant–water relations in subtropical maize fields under mulching and organic fertilization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    7. Xu Lian & Sujong Jeong & Chang-Eui Park & Hao Xu & Laurent Z. X. Li & Tao Wang & Pierre Gentine & Josep Peñuelas & Shilong Piao, 2022. "Biophysical impacts of northern vegetation changes on seasonal warming patterns," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Xu Lian & Wenli Zhao & Pierre Gentine, 2022. "Recent global decline in rainfall interception loss due to altered rainfall regimes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Zhu, Shihua & Fang, Xia & Cao, Liangzhong & Hang, Xin & Xie, Xiaoping & Sun, Liangxiao & Li, Yachun, 2023. "Multivariate drives and their interactive effects on the ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration over Central Asia ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:8:y:2018:i:7:d:10.1038_s41558-018-0207-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.