IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v8y2018i3d10.1038_s41558-018-0087-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigation potential of soil carbon management overestimated by neglecting N2O emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuele Lugato

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources)

  • Adrian Leip

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources)

  • Arwyn Jones

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources)

Abstract

International initiatives such as the ‘4 per 1000’ are promoting enhanced carbon (C) sequestration in agricultural soils as a way to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions 1 . However, changes in soil organic C turnover feed back into the nitrogen (N) cycle 2 , meaning that variation in soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions may offset or enhance C sequestration actions 3 . Here we use a biogeochemistry model on approximately 8,000 soil sampling locations in the European Union 4 to quantify the net CO2 equivalent (CO2e) fluxes associated with representative C-mitigating agricultural practices. Practices based on integrated crop residue retention and lower soil disturbance are found to not increase N2O emissions as long as C accumulation continues (until around 2040), thereafter leading to a moderate C sequestration offset mostly below 47% by 2100. The introduction of N-fixing cover crops allowed higher C accumulation over the initial 20 years, but this gain was progressively offset by higher N2O emissions over time. By 2060, around half of the sites became a net source of greenhouse gases. We conclude that significant CO2 mitigation can be achieved in the initial 20–30 years of any C management scheme, but after that N inputs should be controlled through appropriate management.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuele Lugato & Adrian Leip & Arwyn Jones, 2018. "Mitigation potential of soil carbon management overestimated by neglecting N2O emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 219-223, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:8:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1038_s41558-018-0087-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0087-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0087-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-018-0087-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pomogaev, Vitalii, 2021. "Углеродный Рынок И Климатические Проекты: Перспективы И Возможности Для Алтайского Края [Carbon Market and Climate Projects: Perspectives and Opportunities for the Altai Territory]," MPRA Paper 114303, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Aug 2022.
    2. Maria Giordano & Spyridon A. Petropoulos & Youssef Rouphael, 2021. "The Fate of Nitrogen from Soil to Plants: Influence of Agricultural Practices in Modern Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Schuurman, Daniel & Weersink, Alfons & Delaporte, Aaron, 2021. "Optimal Sequential Crop Choices for Soil Carbon Management: A Dynamic Programming Approach," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314042, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. He, Qinsi & Liu, De Li & Wang, Bin & Li, Linchao & Cowie, Annette & Simmons, Aaron & Zhou, Hongxu & Tian, Qi & Li, Sien & Li, Yi & Liu, Ke & Yan, Haoliang & Harrison, Matthew Tom & Feng, Puyu & Waters, 2022. "Identifying effective agricultural management practices for climate change adaptation and mitigation: A win-win strategy in South-Eastern Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:8:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1038_s41558-018-0087-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.