IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v119y2022pe2109690119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global evidence on the selfish rich inequality hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Ingvild Almås

    (a Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;; b FAIR–Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway)

  • Alexander W. Cappelen

    (b FAIR–Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway)

  • Erik Ø. Sørensen

    (b FAIR–Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway)

  • Bertil Tungodden

    (b FAIR–Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway)

Abstract

People’s beliefs about why the rich are richer than the poor have the potential to affect both policy attitudes and economic development. We provide global evidence showing that where the fortunes of the rich are perceived to be the result of selfish behavior, inequality is viewed as unfair, and there is stronger support for income redistribution. However, we also observe that belief in selfish rich inequality is highly polarized in many countries and thus a source of political disagreement that might be detrimental to economic development. We find systematic country differences in the extent to which people believe that selfishness is a source of inequality, which sheds light on international differences in public morality, civic virtues, and redistributive policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingvild Almås & Alexander W. Cappelen & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2022. "Global evidence on the selfish rich inequality hypothesis," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(3), pages 2109690119-, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2109690119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/119/3/e2109690119.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amasino, Dianna R. & Pace, Davide Domenico & van der Weele, Joël, 2023. "Self-serving bias in redistribution choices: Accounting for beliefs and norms," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Cohn, Alain & Jessen, Lasse J. & Klašnja, Marko & Smeets, Paul, 2023. "Wealthy Americans and redistribution: The role of fairness preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:119:y:2022:p:e2109690119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.