IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2019067061551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies

Author

Listed:
  • Radka MacGregor Pelikánová

    (Metropolitan University Prague, Dubečská 900/10, 100 31 Prague 10, Czech Republic)

  • Eva Daniela Cvik

    (Metropolitan University Prague, Dubečská 900/10, 100 31 Prague 10, Czech Republic)

  • Robert MacGregor

    (Metropolitan University Prague, Dubečská 900/10, 100 31 Prague 10, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Electronic IDentification, Authentication and trust Services ("eIDAS") is a standardized system for trustworthiness, effectiveness and efficiency. Since 2018, Czech public sector bodies have to use qualified electronic signatures when officially acting via electronic documents. This calls for a pioneering study entailing three purposes: (i) to identify provisions set by the EU law and Czech law of this duty and to interpret them, (ii) to study and assess how this duty is materialized and observed while using a pioneering Czech micro case study and (iii) to discuss and compare the yielded results with the status quo in other EU member states. A multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional research of primary and secondary sources is performed along with a Czech micro case study exploring the readiness, implementation and consequences of this new duty on five Czech public sector bodies - Prague municipalities. The qualified electronic signature is a reality in the EU, but its standardized use is welcome and materialized with varying intensities.

Suggested Citation

  • Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Eva Daniela Cvik & Robert MacGregor, 2019. "Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1551-1560.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2019067061551
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967061551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201967061551.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201967061551.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201967061551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Mihaela Dima & Liviu Begu & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Maria Alexandra Maassen, 2018. "The Relationship between the Knowledge Economy and Global Competitiveness in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Magdalena Radulescu & Aleksandra Fedajev & Crenguta Ileana Sinisi & Constanta Popescu & Silvia Elena Iacob, 2018. "Europe 2020 Implementation as Driver of Economic Performance and Competitiveness. Panel Analysis of CEE Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Joanna Cygler & Włodzimierz Sroka & Marina Solesvik & Katarzyna Dębkowska, 2018. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Coopetition: The Roles of Scope and Durability in Coopetitive Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2016. "Technological Potential of European Economy. Proposition of Measurement with Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(3), pages 7-17.
    5. repec:pes:ierequ:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:43-62 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2016. "Technological Potential of European Economy," Working Papers 33/2016, Institute of Economic Research, revised Sep 2016.
    7. Katherine L. Christ & Roger L. Burritt & Mohsen Varsei, 2017. "Coopetition as a Potential Strategy for Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 1029-1040, November.
    8. Elzbieta Pohulak-Zoledowska, 2016. "Innovation In Contemporary Economies," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(3), pages 451-466, September.
    9. Francesco Pasimeni & Paolo Pasimeni, 2016. "An Institutional Analysis of the Europe 2020 Strategy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 1021-1038, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Gregušová & Zuzana Halásová & Tomáš Peráček, 2022. "eIDAS Regulation and Its Impact on National Legislation: The Case of the Slovak Republic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Annual Reports in the EU—A Czech Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Robert K. MacGregor & Radka MacGregor Pelikánova, 2019. "Shareholder Engagement for Corporate Governance in the Light of the Harmonization and Transposition," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 22-34.
    3. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Eva Daniela Cvik, 2018. "Impact of GDPR Security Measures on the Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(6), pages 1535-1542.
    4. Barbara Kryk & Małgorzata Klaudia Guzowska, 2021. "Implementation of Climate/Energy Targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy by the EU Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Cvik Eva Daniela & Pelikánová Radka MacGregor & Malý Michal, 2018. "Selected Issues from the Dark Side of the General Data Protection Regulation," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 18(4), pages 387-407, December.
    6. Eleni Laitsou & Antonios Kargas & Dimitris Varoutas, 2020. "Digital Competitiveness in the European Union Era: The Greek Case," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, October.
    7. Agnieszka Malkowska & Maria Urbaniec & Malgorzata Kosala, 2021. "The impact of digital transformation on European countries: insights from a comparative analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 325-355, June.
    8. Ryszard Borowiecki & Barbara Siuta-Tokarska & Jolanta Maroń & Marcin Suder & Agnieszka Thier & Katarzyna Żmija, 2021. "Developing Digital Economy and Society in the Light of the Issue of Digital Convergence of the Markets in the European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Kenyon MacGregor Robert & MacGregor Pelikánová Radka, 2019. "The nature and meaning of the Directive 2013/34/EU on financial statements according to the CJ EU," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 6(53), pages 246-261, January.
    10. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Violeta Radulescu & Stefan Alexandru Ionescu, 2018. "What Makes Coopetition Successful? An Inter-Organizational Side Analysis on Coopetition Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Tereza Němečková & Robert K. MacGregor, 2021. "CSR Statements in International and Czech Luxury Fashion Industry at the Onset and during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Slowing Down the Fast Fashion Business?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Alberto Tejero & Victor Rodriguez-Doncel & Ivan Pau, 2020. "Knowledge Graphs for Innovation Ecosystems," Papers 2001.08615, arXiv.org.
    14. Baicu Claudia Gabriela & Gârdan Iuliana Petronela & Gârdan Daniel Adrian & Epuran Gheorghe, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on consumer behavior in retail banking. Evidence from Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 534-556, October.
    15. Argatu Ruxandra & Păunescu Carmen, 2019. "Romania and its poverty-alleviating competitiveness: a Central and Eastern European outlook," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 435-447, May.
    16. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    17. Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Manuela TVARONAVICIENE, 2019. "Developing A Holistic System For Social Assistance Services Based On Effective And Sustainable Partnerships," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 103-118, December.
    18. Grigorescu Adriana & Maer Matei Monica Mihaela & Mocanu Cristina & Zamfir Ana-Maria, 2019. "Key drivers and skills need for innovative companies focused on sustainability," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 717-727, May.
    19. Janoskova Katarina & Kral Pavol, 2019. "National innovative performance and sustainable development – the case of Slovakia," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 28-37, May.
    20. Mohsen Mohammadi Khyareh & Nasrin Rostami, 2022. "Macroeconomic Conditions, Innovation and Competitiveness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1321-1340, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2019067061551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.