IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i4p187-d995358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

eIDAS Regulation and Its Impact on National Legislation: The Case of the Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Gregušová

    (Independent Researcher, 811 02 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Zuzana Halásová

    (Cyber Security, Ministry of the Interior of the Slovak Republic, 812 72 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Tomáš Peráček

    (Faculty of Management, Comenius University Bratislava, Odbojarov 10, 820 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The eIDAS Regulation has become a key and, in a way, a ground-breaking piece of legislation of the European Union. It is crucial, in particular, with regard to its ambitious objectives and ground breaking because it was adopted at a time when the Member States of the European Union already had this issue more broadly or narrowly regulated by national laws. In our scientific study, we focus primarily on the critical analysis of the adopted eIDAS Regulation, its impact on the existing e-signature legislation and the amendments adopted, which are necessary to unify the legal framework for electronic signature of the Member States of the European Union. Our main objective was therefore to analyse the legal aspects of the electronic signature. We draw attention to those areas which, because of the regulation adopted, had to be recast and incorporated into the new Trust Services Act, as it emerged from the eIDAS Regulation for us. When processing the topic, we used legal analysis, compliant and available scientific methods as well as selected application problems from practice. In researching and developing a new legal framework for the electronic signature, we also used scientific and doctrinal interpretations associated with the application of scientific and scientific literature contained in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The results of the study indicate that, despite the multi-annual effectiveness of the eIDAS Regulation, there are still problems that need to be addressed by amending it.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Gregušová & Zuzana Halásová & Tomáš Peráček, 2022. "eIDAS Regulation and Its Impact on National Legislation: The Case of the Slovak Republic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:187-:d:995358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Žofčinová Vladimíra & Čajková Andrea & Král Rastislav, 2022. "Local Leader and the Labour Law Position in the Context of the Smart City Concept through the Optics of the EU," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 3-26, May.
    2. Catalin-Silviu Sararu, 2019. "Administrative law in Romania," Books, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), edition 1, number 12.
    3. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Eva Daniela Cvik & Robert MacGregor, 2019. "Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1551-1560.
    4. Catalin-Silviu Sararu, 2017. "European Administrative Space - recent challenges and evolution prospects," Books, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), edition 1, number 2.
    5. Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Ljupčo Todorovski & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2022. "A Review of Digital Era Governance Research in the First Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mária Srebalová & Tomáš Peráček, 2022. "Effective Public Administration as a Tool for Building Smart Cities: The Experience of the Slovak Republic," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Tomáš Peráček & Mária Srebalová & Andrej Srebala, 2022. "The Valuation of Land in Land Consolidation and Relevant Administrative Procedures in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:187-:d:995358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.