IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijhr88/v10y2020i3p134-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualisation of Employee Voice: Definitions, Typologies and Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Larysa Botha
  • Renier Steyn

Abstract

Background- Voice, as an important employee behaviour, channels ideas, concerns, and suggestions upward in the organisation and is often the only way for managers to become aware of issues and problems that, potentially, may be detrimental to the organisation’s performance. Aim- The aim of this article is to present a review on the conceptualisation of voice, with the focus on the different ways in which the concept is defined, categorised and measured. This is required as a comprehensive and contemporary operationalisation of voice and will ensure that future research is linked to the dominant body of knowledge. Setting- Literature presents employee voice behaviour in divergent ways, which applies to the definition, typologies and measurement of voice. This divergence poses a challenge for researchers and practitioners alike. Method- A comprehensive literature review was conducted to obtain a large spectrum of definitions, categorisations and assessments of voice. These were examined for breadth of adoption, consensus in terms of elements and, in the case of assessment, the acceptability of psychometric properties of measuring instruments. Results- After reviewing a substantial number of the articles published in peer-reviewed journals between the years 1970 and 2019, the three most popular definitions of voice are presented, the three most common conceptualisations on the forms/types of voice identified, and three most-used measuring scales with acceptable validity and reliability acknowledged. The definition, typologies, and measuring instrument proposed by Maynes and Podsakoff (2014) seems to be the standard in voice research. Their theorising on all three aspects is well accepted and forms the basis for many recent studies on voice. Conclusion- Building on previous research, and considering recent publications, the comprehensive conceptualisation of voice is best described by the seminal work of Maynes and Podsakoff (2014), which integrates the extant knowledge on the topic and how it is operationalised. Managerial implications- Researchers and practitioners are now aware of most adopted and authoritative conceptualisations of employee voice behaviour, which should provide them with greater confidence to engage in discussions on the topic as well as in facilitating research in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Larysa Botha & Renier Steyn, 2020. "Conceptualisation of Employee Voice: Definitions, Typologies and Measurement," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 134152-1341, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijhr88:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:134-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijhrs/article/download/17495/13539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijhrs/article/view/17495
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Gyensare & Reginald Arthur & Evelyn Twumasi & Joan-Ark Agyapong, 2019. "Leader effectiveness – the missing link in the relationship between employee voice and engagement," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1634910-163, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Theriou & Dimitrios Chatzoudes & Cesar Augusto Diaz Moya, 2020. "The Effect of Ethical Leadership and Leadership Effectiveness on Employee’s Turnover Intention in SMEs: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 947-963.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijhr88:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:134-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijhrs/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.