IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v13y2023i2p53-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Government Policies and Economic Factors on the Growth of Entrepreneurial Activities in Khartoum, Sudan

Author

Listed:
  • Yusra H. M. Babiker
  • Elfadil Timan
  • Malik Elnaeem Mohammed Ali

Abstract

Understanding the influence of government policies and economic factors on the growth of entrepreneurial activities is considered a step towards successful entrepreneurship in Sudan. The goal of this article is to explore the government policies and economic factors which influence the growth of entrepreneurial activities in Khartoum Locality, Khartoum State, Sudan. The research was conducted on a sample of 400 national potential entrepreneurs, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire and personal interviews. Respondents are asked 43 questions to assess their perception of the main factors influencing the growth of entrepreneurial activities. The study adopted an analytical descriptive methodology whereby the data were processed by the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). Percentages, frequencies, and hypothesis tests were used to analyze data. The study revealed that one major problem for entrepreneurs is the high tax fees which hinder the progress of entrepreneurship. Also, not everyone could get a business license. Furthermore, they tend to enter the field of entrepreneurship due to limited government employment opportunities. Entrepreneurs considered entrepreneurship as one of the best solutions for their unemployment problems. Through business incubators, entrepreneurship may expand and flourish in Sudan. Microfinance programs may contribute to the development of entrepreneurial activities, although entrepreneurs face obstacles in such programs, for example, the inability to pay back and the failure of their projects. Credit and loan policies towards entrepreneurs in commercial banks in Sudan need to encourage new ideas and innovations. Self-finance and family finance are important sources for getting money to execute entrepreneurial activities. The study recommends that government agencies should provide financing facilities for entrepreneurs in a way that may contribute to the development of entrepreneurial activities. The government of Khartoum State needs to concentrate more on entrepreneurial training as it is necessary to improve entrepreneurship. It is very important to decrease tax fees because it is a large obstacle facing entrepreneurs. The authorities must facilitate the provision of business licenses to those who have the ability and desire to establish a business. Commercial banks need to strengthen microfinance programs to help entrepreneurs to enter the entrepreneurship field.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusra H. M. Babiker & Elfadil Timan & Malik Elnaeem Mohammed Ali, 2023. "The Influence of Government Policies and Economic Factors on the Growth of Entrepreneurial Activities in Khartoum, Sudan," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(2), pages 53-73, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:53-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/download/20833/16313
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/20833
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Stenkula, 2012. "Taxation and entrepreneurship in a welfare state," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 77-97, July.
    2. Kadyrbek Sultakeev & Kamalbek Karymshakov & Burulcha Sulaimanova, 2018. "The Impact Of Microfinance On Entrepreneurship In Kyrgyzstan," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(2), pages 24-40.
    3. Folashade O. Akinyemi & Oluwabunmi O. Adejumo, 2018. "Government policies and entrepreneurship phases in emerging economies: Nigeria and South Africa," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Anuradha Basu & Simon C. Parker, 2001. "Family Finance and New Business Start‐ups," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 63(3), pages 333-358, July.
    5. Valentina Diana Rusu & Angela Roman, 2017. "Entrepreneurial Activity in the EU: An Empirical Evaluation of Its Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devendra Jarwal & Anju Kahal, 2022. "Informal Economy: Why First- Generation Entrepreneurs Prefer it over Formal Economy?," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 14-22, June.
    2. Xiaoyu Yu & Xiaotong Meng & Laura Stanley & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2024. "Self-employment and life satisfaction: The contingent role of formal institutions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 135-163, June.
    3. Bruce, Donald & Gurley-Calvez, Tami J. & Norwood, Alex, 2020. "Entrepreneurship as Trust," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 16(5), pages 393-443, April.
    4. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    5. Fabiane Tubino Garcia & Carla Schwengber ten Caten & Elaine Aparecida Regiani de Campos & Aline Marian Callegaro & Diego Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, 2022. "Mortality Risk Factors in Micro and Small Businesses: Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-37, February.
    6. Orkhan Nadirov & Bruce Dehning, 2020. "Tax Progressivity and Entrepreneurial Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Wided Ragmoun, 2024. "The impact of environmental entrepreneurship and anti-corruption on environmental degradation," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Serpil Dom Tomak, 2018. "An Analysis of the Macroeconomic Determinants of Entrepreneurial Activity in Turkey," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 128-136.
    9. Mina Baliamoune-Lutz & Pierre Garello, 2014. "Tax structure and entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 165-190, January.
    10. Hoch, Felix & Lohwasser, Todor S., 2019. "The influence of institutions on venture capital: How transaction costs, uncertainty, and change affect new ventures," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 9/2019, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    11. Etayankara Muralidharan & Saurav Pathak, 2018. "Sustainability, Transformational Leadership, and Social Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Tatenda Chidau & Risimati Khosa, 2022. "The interoperability of mobile phone technology as a way to improve immigrant entrepreneurship in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 24-34, December.
    13. Jana Kolaøíková & Ondøej Dvouletý & Petr Kolaøík, 2018. "Economic performance of the NUTS III Regions in the Czech Republic in the context of entrepreneurship subsidies from the EU Structural Funds," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 129-153.
    14. Petutschnig, Matthias, 2017. "Future orientation and taxes: Evidence from big data," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-31.
    15. Dvouletý, Ondřej, 2018. "How to analyse determinants of entrepreneurship and self-employment at the country level? A methodological contribution," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 92-99.
    16. Irina Bilan & Constantin-Marius Apostoaie, 2025. "Tax policy, corruption, and formal business entry: Cross-country evidence from emerging economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1-56, April.
    17. Paweł Dziekański & Piotr Prus & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2021. "Assessment of Spatial Diversity of the Potential of the Natural Environment in the Context of Sustainable Development of Poviats in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Xiaofei Zhang & Longbing Xu, 2021. "Firm life cycle and debt maturity structure: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 937-976, March.
    19. Cristian A Rojas & Felipe Chávez-Bustamante & Rolando Rubilar-Torrealba, 2024. "Human development and entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis of early-stage, intention, and discontinuation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Garima & Atul Dhingra & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2023. "Factors and Activities Considered by First Generation Agripreneurs for Agri-Business Sustainable Development: A Study of Haryana, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:53-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.