Banking Costs, Generalized Functional Forms, and Estimation of Economies of Scale and Scope
Recently, researchers have claimed that the primitive Cobb-Douglas production technology captures banking cost functions adequately. These findings rule out scope economies and U-shaped cost curves. The rejection of the generalized flexible form postulated by the above authors is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition to justify a Cobb-Douglas specification. Using restricted generalized functional forms, the authors find that the composite output Cobb-Douglas specification is an inadequate description of banking cost technology. Translog specifications with multiple products capture the data best, suggesting the presence of both scope and scale economies. Copyright 1989 by Ohio State University Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 21 (1989)
Issue (Month): 3 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2879|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:21:y:1989:i:3:p:368-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.