IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Evaluarea apreciativa a programelor de training. Studiu de caz: Centrul de Consultanta si Training Lumen - Appreciative evaluation of training programs. Case study: Lumen Consulting and Training Center (Romanian version)

Listed author(s):
  • Ph. andu Antonio


    (Researcher of Lumen Research Center, Iasi)

  • Ph. Stefan Cojocaru


    (Assoc. Profesor, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi,Department of Sociology and Social Work, Iasi)

  • Simona Ponea


    (Researcher Assistant, Lumen Research Center, Iasi)

Proposed research, performed as a secondary analysis of data on the project "Virtual Center for Training and Consulting" conducted by the Lumen Association, Iasi, is focused on a qualitative hermeneutic analysis. It showed among other innovative features made in analyzing "globalization of communication" and the "social space virtualization" or a „virtualization of the frame of the social phenomena, "spiritualization of borders (spiritual and cognitive and distances”. Have been highlighted elements about collaborative creativity in developing training programs and the transformation method from the aquarium training method in a research method and also social creativity. Appreciative Inquirey is a particular way to interview subjects and organizational development at the same time to foreshadow future through the adoption of positive relationships based on fundamental inherent positivity person, organization or situation, increasing capacity system of cooperation and change. The method has the fundamental assumption of individuals committed to improve, change and focus on performance.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Published by Expert Projects and indexed by Lumen Department of Economics on Behalf on Social Research Reports in its journal Social Research Reports.

Volume (Year): 8 (2010)
Issue (Month): (February)
Pages: 1-76

in new window

Handle: RePEc:lum:rev6rl:v:8:y:2010:i::p:1-76
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev6rl:v:8:y:2010:i::p:1-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Morariu Irina)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.