IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/scajes/v5y2019i1p160-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Organizational Performance: A Theoretical Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Alecse Stanciu
  • Dumitru-Alexandru Stoica
  • Monika Brigitte Surgun
  • Nicolae Ileana Traistaru
  • Aurelian Vranceanu

Abstract

The challenges of the new economic environment have led to the development of modern global customer-oriented entities and have reduced costs, increased innovation, gaining competitive advantage beyond space and temporality. This paper reflects a dynamic approach to the concept of organizational performance management with the added value of the business core. This study adds to the research on increasing the managerial and economic performance of entities by implementing a performance management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Alecse Stanciu & Dumitru-Alexandru Stoica & Monika Brigitte Surgun & Nicolae Ileana Traistaru & Aurelian Vranceanu, 2019. "Measuring the Organizational Performance: A Theoretical Overview," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(1), pages 160-163, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:160-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_240.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_240.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suwit Srimai & Jack Radford & Chris Wright, 2011. "Evolutionary paths of performance measurement," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 662-687, September.
    2. Eric O. Olsen & Honggeng Zhou & Denis M.S. Lee & Yoke‐Eng Ng & Chow Chewn Chong & Pean Padunchwit, 2007. "Performance measurement system and relationships with performance results," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 559-582, September.
    3. Peterson, Warren & Gijsbers, Govert & Wilks, Michèle, 2003. "An Organizational Performance Assessment System for Agricultural Research Organizations: Concepts, Methods, and Procedures," ISNAR Archive 310698, CGIAR > International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. T.F. Burgess & T.S. Ong & N.E. Shaw, 2007. "Traditional or contemporary? The prevalence of performance measurement system types," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 583-602, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurisyal Muhamad & Sofiah Md Auzair & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Md Daud Ismail, 2016. "Measuring Sustainability Performance Measurement System," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 182-199, JUNE.
    2. Dwivedi, Abhishek & Pawsey, Nicholas, 2023. "Examining the drivers of marketing innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    3. Kanittha Pattanasing & Somnuk Aujirapongpan & Supit Ritkaew & Anuman Chanthawong & Sirichai Deelers, 2021. "The impact of dynamic capabilities and dynamic performance measurement on competitive performance: evidence from Thai hotel entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 10-28, March.
    4. Tze San Ong & Boon Heng Teh & Ah Suat Lee, 2019. "Contingent Factors and Sustainable Performance Measurement (SPM) Practices of Malaysian Electronics and Electrical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, February.
    5. Heinz Holling & Leonie Backhaus, 2023. "A Meta-Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Abd Hadi Mustaffa & Nur Zahidah Bahrudin & Zahariah Sahudin & Hasni Abdullah & Muhammad Ridzuan Abdul Aziz, 2023. "What have we Learned from Firm Efficiency Research for the Past 35 Years? A Bibliometric Analysis," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(1), pages 216-227.
    7. Nurisyal Muhamad & Sofiah Md Auzair & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Md Daud Ismail, 2016. "Measuring Sustainability Performance Measurement System," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 12(3), pages 182-199, JUNE.
    8. Aan Widodo, 2022. "The External Communication in Organizational Performance at Court Of Justice," GATR Journals gjbssr610, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    9. Sharma, Vivek & Bhat, Dada Ab Rouf, 2020. "Co-creation and service innovation as performance indicators in the hospitality industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 76-95..
    10. Lima, Eliana Sangreman & McMahon, Paul & Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas, 2021. "Establishing the relationship between asset management and business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. ȘERBAN Radu-Alexandru & HERCIU Mihaela, 2019. "Performance Management Systems – Proposing And Testing A Conceptual Model," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 231-244, April.
    12. Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Munik, Juliano, 2013. "Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 524-542.
    13. Wu, Shang-Ho & Lin, Feng-Jyh & Perng, Chyuan, 2022. "The affecting factors of small and medium enterprise performance 11The authors thank Kunhuang Huarng, National taipei University of Bussiness, and Fang-Yi Lo, Feng Chia University for their careful re," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 94-104.
    14. Shahryar Sorooshian & Nursofea Iman Ahmad Suffian, 2017. "Small and Medium Enterprises’ Risk Modeling," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 197-201.
    15. Iskandar Muda, 2014. "Human Resources Development and Performance of Government Provincial Employees: A Study in North Sumatera, Indonesia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 152-162.
    16. Yuliansyah Yuliansyah & Biana Adha Inapty & Muhammad Dahlan & Intan Oktri Agtia, 2018. "Budgetary Participation And Its Impact On Individual Performance," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 24(2), pages 325-340, December.
    17. Abdullah, Hariem & Tursoy, Turgut, 2021. "Capital structure and firm performance: a panel causality test," MPRA Paper 105871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Cláudia Ferreira Leitão & Jorge Gomes & Denise Capela dos Santos & Bruno Melo Maia, 2021. "Impact of Leadership on the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance: Portuguese Hotel Sector," International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management in the Digital Age (IJTHMDA), IGI Global, vol. 5(2), pages 29-49, July.
    19. Abdul Morlai Kanu & Ibrahim Sesay, 2016. "The Practice of Performance Measurement in Small and Medium Enterprises: Empirical Evidence from a Developed Economy Perspective," Quarterly Journal of Business Studies, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 2(3), pages 160-173.
    20. Pant, Laxmi P., 2010. "Assessing Innovations in International Research and Development Practice," MERIT Working Papers 2010-043, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organizational performance; digital age; KPI;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:160-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.