IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v38y2025i1d10.1007_s11138-023-00630-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating rationality and spiritedness to correct a misleading dichotomy

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Moore

    (George Mason University Emeritus)

  • Richard E. Wagner

    (George Mason University Emeritus)

Abstract

Economists have long labored under a misleading dichotomy between rationality and spiritedness where a market economy reflects the cool sobriety of rational calculation that sometimes is thought to be impaired by irrational animal spirits. Within this scheme of thought, those individuals who constitute society are effectively reduced to a societal average or representative agent, where aggregation is reflective of choice, rather than interaction. In contrast, we theorize by distinguishing market and state enterprises as creating an observed disordering due to the institutions that govern them. Within this alternative scheme of thought, reason and spirit are both features of the human organism, with individuals varying in the degrees to which their actions entail these features. What results is recognition that orderliness and volatility are both ineradicable features of human population systems, and, moreover, that polity and economy inject non-congruent modes of action into entangled systems of political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Moore & Richard E. Wagner, 2025. "Integrating rationality and spiritedness to correct a misleading dichotomy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 55-71, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:38:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11138-023-00630-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11138-023-00630-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11138-023-00630-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11138-023-00630-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Podemska-Mikluch & Richard Wagner, 2013. "Dyads, triads, and the theory of exchange: Between liberty and coercion," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 171-182, June.
    2. Virgil Henry Storr, 2019. "Ludwig Lachmann’s peculiar status within Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 63-75, March.
    3. ., 2008. "The Economic Rationale of Intellectual Property Rights," Chapters, in: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Software Technologies, chapter 2, pages 5-30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Smith,Vernon L., 2009. "Rationality in Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521133388, June.
    5. Abigail N. Devereaux & Richard E. Wagner, 2020. "Contrasting Visions for Macroeconomic Theory: DSGE and OEE," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 65(1), pages 28-50, March.
    6. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, December.
    7. Richard Wagner, 2012. "Viennese kaleidics: Why it’s liberty more than policy that calms turbulence," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 25(4), pages 283-297, December.
    8. Roger Koppl, 2002. "Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-62924-0, May.
    9. Alan P. Kirman, 1992. "Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 117-136, Spring.
    10. Richard E. Wagner, 2015. "Welfare Economics and Second-Best Theory: Filling Imaginary Economic Boxes," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 35(1), pages 133-146, Winter.
    11. Cowen, Tyler, 2003. "Entrepreneurship, Austrian Economics, and the Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 5-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan W. Plante, 2022. "Richard E. Wagner, Macroeconomics as Systems Theory: Transcending the Micro-Macro Dichotomy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. Xiii +313 pages. 119.99 USD (hardback)," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 561-566, December.
    2. Abigail N. Devereaux & Richard E. Wagner, 2020. "Contrasting Visions for Macroeconomic Theory: DSGE and OEE," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 65(1), pages 28-50, March.
    3. Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2015. "An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 305-332, October.
    4. Juan Manuel Larrosa, 2016. "Agentes computacionales y análisis económico," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 18(34), pages 87-113, January-J.
    5. Joshua M. Epstein, 2007. "Agent-Based Computational Models and Generative Social Science," Introductory Chapters, in: Generative Social Science Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton University Press.
    6. Tamotsu Onozaki, 2018. "Nonlinearity, Bounded Rationality, and Heterogeneity," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-4-431-54971-0, December.
    7. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/53r60a8s3kup1vc9l5643ehjk is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 1998. "Teaching Agent-Based Computational Economics to Graduate Students," ISU General Staff Papers 199807010700001043, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. James Caton & Richard E. Wagner, 2015. "Volatility in Catallactical Systems: Austrian Cycle Theory Revisited," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: New Thinking in Austrian Political Economy, volume 19, pages 95-117, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    10. Giorgio Fagiolo & Paul Windrum & Alessio Moneta, 2006. "Empirical Validation of Agent Based Models: A Critical Survey," LEM Papers Series 2006/14, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Giorgio Fagiolo & Giovanni Dosi & Roberto Gabriele, 2005. "Towards an evolutionary interpretation of aggregate labor market regularities," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Elias Dinopoulos & Robert F. Lanzillotti (ed.), Entrepreneurships, the New Economy and Public Policy, pages 223-252, Springer.
    12. Stephen G. Zimmer, 2023. "Rethinking the role of human Capital in Growth Models," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 567-588, December.
    13. Mikayla Novak, 2024. "Coercive advantage," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(4), pages 457-476, December.
    14. Paola Tubaro, 2011. "Computational Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. James Caton, 2017. "Entrepreneurship, search costs, and ecological rationality in an agent-based economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 107-130, March.
    16. Mauro Napoletano & Jean-Luc Gaffard & Zakaria Babutsidze, 2012. "Agent Based Models A New Tool for Economic and Policy Analysis," Working Papers hal-01070338, HAL.
    17. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/53r60a8s3kup1vc9l5643ehjk is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Edgardo Bucciarelli & Marcello Silvestri, 2013. "Hyman P. Minsky's unorthodox approach: recent advances in simulation techniques to develop his theoretical assumptions," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 299-324.
    19. Giovanni Dosi & Giorgio Fagiolo & Andrea Roventini, 2006. "An Evolutionary Model of Endogenous Business Cycles," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 3-34, February.
    20. McFadzean, David & Tesfatsion, Leigh, 1999. "A C++ Platform for the Evolution of Trade Networks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 109-134, October.
    21. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/53r60a8s3kup1vc9l5643ehjk is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Pietro Terna, 1998. "Simulation Tools for Social Scientists: Building Agent Based Models with SWARM," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 1(2), pages 1-4.
    23. repec:jpe:journl:1481 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Lux, Thomas, 2008. "Applications of statistical physics in finance and economics," Kiel Working Papers 1425, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:38:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11138-023-00630-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.