IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert Advice and Regulatory Complexity


  • Heyes, Anthony G


Ex-regulators often enjoy lucrative periods either working for, or selling advice to, the industry they previously policed. Conventional wisdom is that such jobs are rewards for earlier favors and indicate capture of the regulator by the industry. In the model here, successive generations of regulators maintain an excessively opaque "regulatory interface". The opacity underpins their post-regulatory employability and has, we will argue, a self-sustaining character. The analysis points to a causal link between the phenomenon of the revolving door, the oft-alleged over-complexity of regulatory practices and procedures, and resistance to their reform. The industry can be said to have been "captured" by the regulator. Cooling-off periods may or may not be useful in mitigation. Copyright 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Heyes, Anthony G, 2003. "Expert Advice and Regulatory Complexity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 119-133, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:119-33

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:kap:regeco:v:52:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11149-017-9338-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Christiansen, Arndt, 2005. "Der "more economic approach" in der EU-Fusionskontrolle - eine kritische Würdigung," Research Notes 21, Deutsche Bank Research.
    3. Andreas Schulze, 2004. "Alternative Liberalisierungsansätze in Netzindustrien," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 64, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    4. Andreas Schulze, 2004. "Liberalisierungen in Netzindustrien aus polit-ökonomischer Sicht - Eine positive Analyse der Interessenbedingtheit von Privatisierungen und Marktöffnungen am Beispiel netzgebundener Wirtschaftsbereich," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 68, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:regeco:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:119-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.